EGGS vs. EGGQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EGGS (NestYield Total Return Guard ETF) and EGGQ (NestYield Visionary ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from NestYield. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EGGS returned 32.43% vs 61.68% for EGGQ. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.89% expense ratio.

Performance

EGGS vs. EGGQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGGS achieves a 23.37% return, which is significantly lower than EGGQ's 39.75% return.

EGGS

• 1D: -2.26%
• 1M: 9.06%
• YTD: 23.37%
• 6M: 21.02%
• 1Y: 32.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EGGQ

• 1D: -6.25%
• 1M: 9.79%
• YTD: 39.75%
• 6M: 36.73%
• 1Y: 61.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGGS vs. EGGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF	23.37%	14.41%	-1.96%
EGGQ NestYield Visionary ETF	39.75%	25.92%	-0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between EGGS and EGGQ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024	0.92

The correlation between EGGS and EGGQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EGGS vs. EGGQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGGS

EGGS Risk / Return Rank: 36
EGGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
EGGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
EGGS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
EGGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
EGGS Martin Ratio Rank: 30

EGGQ

EGGQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
EGGQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
EGGQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
EGGQ Omega Ratio Rank: 52
EGGQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
EGGQ Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGGS vs. EGGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EGGS	EGGQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	1.82	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	2.27	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.31	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	3.14	-1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.07	8.35	-4.28

EGGS vs. EGGQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the EGGQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGGS and EGGQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EGGS vs. EGGQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGGS drawdown since its inception was -18.52%, smaller than the maximum EGGQ drawdown of -22.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGS and EGGQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EGGS	EGGQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.52%	-22.70%	+4.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.17%	-19.76%	+1.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.26%	-6.25%	+3.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.71%	-5.64%	-0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.98%	7.41%	+0.57%

Volatility

EGGS vs. EGGQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) is 10.61%, while NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) has a volatility of 15.85%. This indicates that EGGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EGGS	EGGQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.61%	15.85%	-5.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.45%	28.31%	-7.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.04%	34.06%	-9.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.23%	34.14%	-8.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.23%	34.14%	-8.91%

EGGS vs. EGGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EGGS and EGGQ have an expense ratio of 0.89%.

Dividends

EGGS vs. EGGQ - Dividend Comparison

EGGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.71%, more than EGGQ's 5.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
EGGQ NestYield Visionary ETF	5.47%	5.70%
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF	14.71%	14.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EGGS and EGGQ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, EGGS and EGGQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EGGS or EGGQ?

EGGQ has higher volatility (15.85%) compared to EGGS (10.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGS dropped -18.52% vs EGGQ's -22.70%.

Which ETF is better, EGGS or EGGQ?

On 1-year performance, EGGQ leads with 61.68% vs 32.43% for EGGS. Both ETFs have the same 0.89% expense ratio. On volatility, EGGS has been the lower-risk option at 10.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EGGS or EGGQ?

Over the 1-year period, EGGQ has performed better with a 61.68% return vs 32.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EGGS or EGGQ?

EGGS and EGGQ have the same expense ratio: 0.89% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EGGS or EGGQ?

EGGS has the higher dividend yield at 14.71%, compared with 5.47% for EGGQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EGGQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.