EFV vs. SPDW
EFV (iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF) and SPDW (SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - EFV tracks the MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net) while SPDW tracks the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFV returned 10.51%/yr vs 10.02%/yr for SPDW. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EFV charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPDW.
Performance
EFV vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFV achieves a 16.57% return, which is significantly higher than SPDW's 14.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EFV having a 10.51% annualized return and SPDW not far behind at 10.02%.
EFV
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- YTD
- 16.57%
- 1Y
- 34.58%
- 3Y*
- 23.11%
- 5Y*
- 14.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.15%
SPDW
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- YTD
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 30.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $246.44M | $344.02M | $395.70M | |
| $136.01M | $160.57M | $162.83M |
EFV vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 16.57% | 42.22% | 5.35% | 18.85% | -5.22% | 11.08% | -2.97% | 15.80% | -14.67% | 21.22% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 14.95% | 34.75% | 3.55% | 17.81% | -15.98% | 11.45% | 9.90% | 22.41% | -14.22% | 25.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFV and SPDW is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2007 | 0.92 |
The correlation between EFV and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFV vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFV
SPDW
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Real Estate
Financial Services
EFV
SPDW
Industrials
EFV
SPDW
Consumer Defensive
EFV
SPDW
Healthcare
EFV
SPDW
Energy
EFV
SPDW
Utilities
EFV
SPDW
Basic Materials
EFV
SPDW
Consumer Cyclical
EFV
SPDW
Communication Services
EFV
SPDW
Technology
EFV
SPDW
Real Estate
EFV
SPDW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFV vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank
EFV
SPDW
EFV vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFV | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.33 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 2.66 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.90 | 10.04 | +1.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFV vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFV drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, which is greater than SPDW's maximum drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFV and SPDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFV | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.94% | -60.02% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.90% | -11.55% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.72% | -13.53% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.84% | -30.21% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.16% | -34.98% | -8.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -1.56% | +1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.72% | -12.82% | -1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 3.05% | -0.14% |
Volatility
EFV vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) is 3.85%, while SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that EFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFV | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 5.25% | -1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.21% | 15.15% | -2.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.39% | 17.09% | -2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 16.78% | -0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 17.13% | +0.33% |
EFV vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFV has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFV vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison
EFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than SPDW's 3.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 4.51% | 4.16% | 4.66% | 4.36% | 4.17% | 4.07% | 2.42% | 4.62% | 4.56% | 3.56% | 3.28% | 3.59% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 3.01% | 3.30% | 3.19% | 2.75% | 3.12% | 3.04% | 1.87% | 3.13% | 3.08% | 1.86% | 3.11% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFV and SPDW have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPDW has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to EFV (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFV dropped -63.94% vs SPDW's -60.02%.
On 10-year performance, EFV leads with 10.51% vs 10.02% for SPDW. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, EFV has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EFV has performed better with a 10.51% return vs 10.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EFV.
EFV has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 3.01% for SPDW.
EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net), while SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EFV and 0.04% for SPDW.
EFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFV and SPDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer