EFV vs. IPOS
EFV (iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF) and IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - EFV tracks the MSCI EAFE Value Index while IPOS tracks the Renaissance International IPO Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFV returned 9.75%/yr vs 3.00%/yr for IPOS. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EFV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for IPOS.
Performance
EFV vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFV achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 40.15% return. Over the past 10 years, EFV has outperformed IPOS with an annualized return of 9.75%, while IPOS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.00% annualized return.
EFV
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 9.13%
- 6M
- 12.94%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- 21.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.07%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
IPOS
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 40.15%
- 6M
- 44.26%
- 1Y
- 65.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- -7.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.00%
EFV vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 9.13% | 42.22% | 5.35% | 18.85% | -5.22% | 11.08% | -2.97% | 15.80% | -14.67% | 21.22% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 40.15% | 39.93% | -12.34% | -16.49% | -33.46% | -30.62% | 50.71% | 30.93% | -22.33% | 36.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFV and IPOS is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2014 | 0.49 |
The correlation between EFV and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EFV vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFV
IPOS
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
EFV
IPOS
Industrials
EFV
IPOS
Consumer Defensive
EFV
IPOS
Basic Materials
EFV
IPOS
Healthcare
EFV
IPOS
Energy
EFV
IPOS
Utilities
EFV
IPOS
Consumer Cyclical
EFV
IPOS
Communication Services
EFV
IPOS
Technology
EFV
IPOS
Real Estate
EFV
IPOS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFV vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank
EFV
IPOS
EFV vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFV | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.41 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 3.83 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.57 | 11.58 | -2.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFV | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 2.24 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | -0.28 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.12 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.09 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
EFV vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFV drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFV and IPOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFV | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.94% | -73.09% | +9.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.90% | -17.17% | +6.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.72% | -34.08% | +20.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.84% | -69.93% | +44.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.16% | -73.09% | +29.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -40.44% | +37.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.83% | -31.99% | +17.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 5.67% | -2.76% |
Volatility
EFV vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) is 4.52%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 12.05%. This indicates that EFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFV | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 12.05% | -7.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.56% | 26.45% | -14.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.21% | 29.41% | -15.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 27.19% | -11.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 24.13% | -6.27% |
EFV vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFV vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison
EFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than IPOS's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 3.81% | 4.16% | 4.66% | 4.36% | 4.17% | 4.07% | 2.42% | 4.62% | 4.56% | 3.56% | 3.28% | 3.59% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 0.68% | 1.04% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.89% | 1.12% | 0.87% | 1.73% | 1.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFV and IPOS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPOS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to EFV (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFV dropped -63.94% vs IPOS's -73.09%.
On 10-year performance, EFV leads with 9.75% vs 3.00% for IPOS. On fees, EFV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, EFV has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EFV has performed better with a 9.75% return vs 3.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.
EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 0.68% for IPOS.
EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index, while IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EFV and 0.80% for IPOS.
IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFV and IPOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer