EFR.TO vs. RMD
EFR.TO (Energy Fuels Inc.) and RMD (ResMed Inc.) are both stocks. EFR.TO operates in Uranium (Energy), while RMD operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, EFR.TO returned 21.00%/yr vs 14.84%/yr for RMD. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EFR.TO vs. RMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EFR.TO is traded in CAD, while RMD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RMD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFR.TO achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly higher than RMD's -16.97% return. Over the past 10 years, EFR.TO has outperformed RMD with an annualized return of 21.00%, while RMD has yielded a comparatively lower 14.84% annualized return.
EFR.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -24.06%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- 1Y
- 187.96%
- 3Y*
- 34.35%
- 5Y*
- 19.77%
- 10Y*
- 21.00%
RMD
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- -16.97%
- 6M
- -21.19%
- 1Y
- -20.18%
- 3Y*
- -0.76%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
EFR.TO vs. RMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFR.TO Energy Fuels Inc. | 5.89% | 169.01% | -22.21% | 13.37% | -13.25% | 78.89% | 117.74% | -35.92% | 71.24% | 2.26% |
RMD ResMed Inc. | -16.97% | 1.41% | 45.55% | -18.53% | -14.37% | 23.35% | 35.05% | 32.16% | 47.85% | 29.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFR.TO and RMD is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.12 |
The correlation between EFR.TO and RMD shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.15 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EFR.TO:
-$0.30
RMD:
$13.78
EFR.TO:
41.45
RMD:
3.88
EFR.TO:
$84.86M
RMD:
$5.54B
EFR.TO:
$25.23M
RMD:
$3.42B
EFR.TO:
-$72.89M
RMD:
$2.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFR.TO vs. RMD — Risk / Return Rank
EFR.TO
RMD
EFR.TO vs. RMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) and ResMed Inc. (RMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFR.TO | RMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.87 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | -0.54 | +4.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | -1.19 | +8.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFR.TO vs. RMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFR.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than RMD's maximum drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFR.TO and RMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFR.TO | RMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -50.37% | -49.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.09% | -37.56% | -13.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.28% | -38.05% | -21.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.59% | -50.37% | -14.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.32% | -50.37% | -27.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.13% | -32.76% | -59.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.43% | -13.22% | -78.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.24% | 16.96% | +9.28% |
Volatility
EFR.TO vs. RMD - Volatility Comparison
Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) has a higher volatility of 29.13% compared to ResMed Inc. (RMD) at 10.24%. This indicates that EFR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFR.TO | RMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.13% | 10.24% | +18.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.37% | 19.68% | +46.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.73% | 24.65% | +73.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.77% | 31.63% | +40.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.81% | 32.17% | +38.64% |
Dividends
EFR.TO vs. RMD - Dividend Comparison
EFR.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFR.TO Energy Fuels Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RMD ResMed Inc. | 1.23% | 0.94% | 0.88% | 1.07% | 0.83% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.98% | 1.26% | 1.61% | 2.03% | 2.16% |
Financials
EFR.TO vs. RMD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Fuels Inc. and ResMed Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EFR.TO vs. RMD - Profitability Comparison
EFR.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.36M and revenue of 35.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.
RMD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a gross profit of 890.98M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.3%.
EFR.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported an operating income of -14.55M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in an operating margin of -40.6%.
RMD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported an operating income of 499.81M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.
EFR.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a net income of -10.84M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in a net margin of -30.3%.
RMD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a net income of 398.73M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EFR.TO and RMD have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EFR.TO and RMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer