RMD vs. DHR
RMD (ResMed Inc.) and DHR (Danaher Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — RMD in Medical Instruments & Supplies, DHR in Diagnostics & Research. Over the past 10 years, RMD returned 13.03%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for DHR. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RMD vs. DHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMD achieves a -11.95% return, which is significantly higher than DHR's -14.47% return. Over the past 10 years, RMD has outperformed DHR with an annualized return of 13.03%, while DHR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.08% annualized return.
RMD
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- -17.89%
- YTD
- -11.95%
- 1Y
- -23.69%
- 3Y*
- -1.21%
- 5Y*
- -4.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.57%
DHR
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- 6M
- -10.55%
- YTD
- -14.47%
- 1Y
- -0.34%
- 3Y*
- -4.26%
- 5Y*
- -5.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.81B | $1.26B | $962.73M | |
RMD ResMed Inc. | $221.77M | $287.46M | $300.95M |
RMD vs. DHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMD ResMed Inc. | -11.95% | 6.26% | 34.18% | -16.55% | -19.47% | 23.41% | 38.33% | 37.85% | 36.38% | 39.06% |
DHR Danaher Corporation | -14.47% | 0.35% | -0.35% | -1.22% | -19.02% | 48.57% | 45.34% | 49.55% | 11.80% | 20.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMD and DHR is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 1995 | 0.34 |
The correlation between RMD and DHR shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.47 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RMD:
$30.60B
DHR:
$137.13B
RMD:
$15.50
DHR:
$5.63
RMD:
13.61
DHR:
34.62
RMD:
3.73
DHR:
5.52
RMD:
$5.54B
DHR:
$25.11B
RMD:
$3.42B
DHR:
$14.69B
RMD:
$2.10B
DHR:
$6.43B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMD vs. DHR — Risk / Return Rank
RMD
DHR
RMD vs. DHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ResMed Inc. (RMD) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMD | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.03 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | -0.01 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | -0.02 | -1.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMD vs. DHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMD drawdown since its inception was -61.61%, which is greater than DHR's maximum drawdown of -45.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMD and DHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMD | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.61% | -45.80% | -15.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.28% | -32.97% | -4.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.28% | -41.72% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.99% | -43.81% | -10.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.99% | -43.81% | -10.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.62% | -32.19% | +4.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.06% | -10.30% | -5.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.03% | 15.66% | +4.37% |
Volatility
RMD vs. DHR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ResMed Inc. (RMD) is 12.95%, while Danaher Corporation (DHR) has a volatility of 15.48%. This indicates that RMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMD | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.95% | 15.48% | -2.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.18% | 24.23% | -1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.51% | 31.20% | -3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.52% | 28.76% | +2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.69% | 26.01% | +5.68% |
Dividends
RMD vs. DHR - Dividend Comparison
RMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than DHR's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHR Danaher Corporation | 0.74% | 0.56% | 0.47% | 12.64% | 0.38% | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.62% | 0.60% | 32.55% | 0.58% |
RMD ResMed Inc. | 1.14% | 0.94% | 0.88% | 1.07% | 0.83% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.98% | 1.26% | 1.61% | 2.03% | 2.16% |
Financials
RMD vs. DHR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ResMed Inc. and Danaher Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RMD vs. DHR - Profitability Comparison
RMD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a gross profit of 890.98M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.3%.
DHR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.61B and revenue of 6.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.
RMD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ResMed Inc. reported an operating income of 499.81M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.
DHR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Danaher Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 6.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.0%.
RMD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a net income of 398.73M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.
DHR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a net income of 870.00M and revenue of 6.27B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RMD and DHR have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHR has higher volatility (15.48%) compared to RMD (12.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMD dropped -61.61% vs DHR's -45.80%.
DHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RMD and DHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer