PortfoliosLab logo
RMD vs. DXCM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RMD and DXCM is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RMD vs. DXCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ResMed Inc. (RMD) and DexCom, Inc. (DXCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RMD:

0.51

DXCM:

-0.58

Sortino Ratio

RMD:

0.84

DXCM:

-0.40

Omega Ratio

RMD:

1.12

DXCM:

0.92

Calmar Ratio

RMD:

0.43

DXCM:

-0.52

Martin Ratio

RMD:

1.93

DXCM:

-0.84

Ulcer Index

RMD:

8.23%

DXCM:

39.31%

Daily Std Dev

RMD:

33.76%

DXCM:

58.70%

Max Drawdown

RMD:

-61.60%

DXCM:

-94.61%

Current Drawdown

RMD:

-11.96%

DXCM:

-46.59%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RMD:

$36.90B

DXCM:

$33.52B

EPS

RMD:

$8.91

DXCM:

$1.33

PE Ratio

RMD:

28.25

DXCM:

64.27

PEG Ratio

RMD:

1.50

DXCM:

1.32

PS Ratio

RMD:

7.35

DXCM:

8.08

PB Ratio

RMD:

6.65

DXCM:

14.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

RMD:

$5.02B

DXCM:

$4.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RMD:

$2.94B

DXCM:

$2.46B

EBITDA (TTM)

RMD:

$1.71B

DXCM:

$889.80M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RMD having a 11.27% return and DXCM slightly higher at 11.82%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RMD having a 17.52% annualized return and DXCM not far ahead at 17.61%.


RMD

YTD

11.27%

1M

19.25%

6M

6.29%

1Y

16.96%

3Y*

9.62%

5Y*

10.31%

10Y*

17.52%

DXCM

YTD

11.82%

1M

26.82%

6M

14.02%

1Y

-33.80%

3Y*

2.69%

5Y*

-2.75%

10Y*

17.61%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ResMed Inc.

DexCom, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RMD vs. DXCM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RMD is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RMD is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RMD is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RMD is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RMD is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RMD is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DXCM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DXCM is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DXCM is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DXCM is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DXCM is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DXCM is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DXCM is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RMD vs. DXCM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ResMed Inc. (RMD) and DexCom, Inc. (DXCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the DXCM Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMD and DXCM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

RMD vs. DXCM - Dividend Comparison

RMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while DXCM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RMD
ResMed Inc.
0.84%0.88%1.07%0.83%0.62%0.73%0.98%1.26%1.61%2.03%2.16%1.89%
DXCM
DexCom, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RMD vs. DXCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMD drawdown since its inception was -61.60%, smaller than the maximum DXCM drawdown of -94.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMD and DXCM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RMD vs. DXCM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ResMed Inc. (RMD) is 9.85%, while DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) has a volatility of 17.10%. This indicates that RMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

RMD vs. DXCM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ResMed Inc. and DexCom, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20212022202320242025
1.29B
1.04B
(RMD) Total Revenue
(DXCM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RMD vs. DXCM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ResMed Inc. and DexCom, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
59.3%
56.9%
(RMD) Gross Margin
(DXCM) Gross Margin
RMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ResMed Inc. reported a gross profit of 766.41M and revenue of 1.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.3%.

DXCM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, DexCom, Inc. reported a gross profit of 589.00M and revenue of 1.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.9%.

RMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ResMed Inc. reported an operating income of 426.27M and revenue of 1.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.0%.

DXCM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, DexCom, Inc. reported an operating income of 133.70M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

RMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ResMed Inc. reported a net income of 365.04M and revenue of 1.29B, resulting in a net margin of 28.3%.

DXCM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, DexCom, Inc. reported a net income of 105.40M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.