EFO vs. CIFG
EFO (ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE) and CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EFO is passively managed, while CIFG is actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EFO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CIFG.
Performance
EFO vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly lower than CIFG's 96.56% return.
EFO
- 1D
- -3.85%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 12.32%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- 36.54%
- 3Y*
- 23.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.79%
CIFG
- 1D
- -3.87%
- 1M
- 42.24%
- YTD
- 96.56%
- 6M
- 67.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFO vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 12.32% | 2.34% |
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 96.56% | -32.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFO and CIFG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFO vs. CIFG — Risk / Return Rank
EFO
CIFG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EFO vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFO | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFO vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, smaller than the maximum CIFG drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and CIFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFO | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.52% | -71.71% | +8.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.00% | -10.44% | +4.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.62% | -35.54% | +16.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.49% | — | — |
Volatility
EFO vs. CIFG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFO | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.89% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.71% | 205.93% | -174.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.20% | 205.93% | -172.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.65% | 205.93% | -172.28% |
EFO vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFO vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison
EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while CIFG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 1.54% | 1.65% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFO and CIFG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EFO.
EFO has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.00% for CIFG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFO and 0.75% for CIFG.
Find the right allocation for EFO and CIFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer