EFO vs. EFG
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG).
EFO and EFG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2009. EFG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Growth Index. It was launched on Aug 1, 2005. Both EFO and EFG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EFO or EFG.
Correlation
The correlation between EFO and EFG is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EFO vs. EFG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EFO:
0.18
EFG:
0.36
EFO:
0.42
EFG:
0.61
EFO:
1.05
EFG:
1.07
EFO:
0.18
EFG:
0.36
EFO:
0.53
EFG:
1.11
EFO:
8.63%
EFG:
4.73%
EFO:
25.52%
EFG:
14.46%
EFO:
-63.53%
EFG:
-58.40%
EFO:
-21.29%
EFG:
-9.34%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly higher than EFG's 1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, EFO has underperformed EFG with an annualized return of 3.63%, while EFG has yielded a comparatively higher 5.68% annualized return.
EFO
2.44%
-3.13%
-10.03%
6.63%
0.05%
3.63%
EFG
1.33%
-2.53%
-3.93%
6.26%
3.49%
5.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFO vs. EFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EFG's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EFO vs. EFG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EFO
EFG
EFO vs. EFG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EFO vs. EFG - Dividend Comparison
EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than EFG's 1.62% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 2.19% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF | 1.62% | 1.64% | 1.63% | 1.27% | 1.54% | 0.85% | 1.69% | 1.98% | 1.56% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.34% |
Drawdowns
EFO vs. EFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.53%, which is greater than EFG's maximum drawdown of -58.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and EFG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EFO vs. EFG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) at 4.05%. This indicates that EFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.