EFO vs. EET
EFO (ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE) and EET (ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - EFO tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (200%) while EET tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFO returned 10.16%/yr vs 11.03%/yr for EET. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EFO vs. EET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly lower than EET's 54.14% return. Over the past 10 years, EFO has underperformed EET with an annualized return of 10.16%, while EET has yielded a comparatively higher 11.03% annualized return.
EFO
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 6.17%
- YTD
- 12.87%
- 6M
- 17.60%
- 1Y
- 34.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.18%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
EET
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- 17.51%
- YTD
- 54.14%
- 6M
- 60.18%
- 1Y
- 118.88%
- 3Y*
- 38.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
EFO vs. EET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 12.87% | 58.51% | -2.15% | 25.77% | -33.62% | 19.38% | 2.29% | 40.93% | -30.91% | 51.78% |
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 54.14% | 63.14% | 2.88% | 7.06% | -43.07% | -10.93% | 18.92% | 31.87% | -33.84% | 82.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFO and EET is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2009 | 0.69 |
The correlation between EFO and EET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFO vs. EET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFO
EET
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
EFO
EET
Basic Materials
EFO
-
EET
-
Communication Services
EFO
-
EET
-
Consumer Cyclical
EFO
-
EET
-
Consumer Defensive
EFO
-
EET
-
Energy
EFO
-
EET
-
Healthcare
EFO
-
EET
-
Industrials
EFO
-
EET
-
Real Estate
EFO
-
EET
-
Technology
EFO
-
EET
-
Utilities
EFO
-
EET
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFO vs. EET — Risk / Return Rank
EFO
EET
EFO vs. EET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFO | EET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.46 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 4.53 | -2.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.42 | 16.64 | -11.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFO | EET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 3.02 | -1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.11 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.27 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.12 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
EFO vs. EET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, smaller than the maximum EET drawdown of -71.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and EET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFO | EET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.52% | -71.66% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.18% | -26.38% | +4.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.85% | -34.89% | +8.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.95% | -64.88% | +10.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.52% | -69.07% | +5.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.54% | -2.52% | -3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.67% | -37.27% | +18.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.39% | 7.17% | -0.78% |
Volatility
EFO vs. EET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) is 10.08%, while ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a volatility of 17.46%. This indicates that EFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFO | EET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.08% | 17.46% | -7.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.18% | 34.52% | -9.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.54% | 39.66% | -9.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.98% | 37.78% | -4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.09% | 40.60% | -6.51% |
EFO vs. EET - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EFO and EET have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EFO vs. EET - Dividend Comparison
EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than EET's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 1.23% | 1.82% | 3.85% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 0.16% |
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 1.54% | 1.65% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFO and EET have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EET has higher volatility (17.46%) compared to EFO (10.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFO dropped -63.52% vs EET's -71.66%.
On 10-year performance, EET leads with 11.03% vs 10.16% for EFO. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EFO has been the lower-risk option at 10.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EET has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 10.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFO and EET have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
EFO has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 1.23% for EET.
EFO tracks MSCI EAFE Index (200%), while EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%).
EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFO and EET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer