EFNL vs. EUDV
EFNL (iShares MSCI Finland ETF) and EUDV (ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EFNL tracks the MSCI Finland IMI 25/50 Index while EUDV tracks the MSCI Europe Dividend Masters Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFNL returned 10.12%/yr vs 5.31%/yr for EUDV. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFNL charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for EUDV.
Performance
EFNL vs. EUDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFNL achieves a 21.56% return, which is significantly higher than EUDV's 2.54% return. Over the past 10 years, EFNL has outperformed EUDV with an annualized return of 10.12%, while EUDV has yielded a comparatively lower 5.31% annualized return.
EFNL
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 21.56%
- 6M
- 27.81%
- 1Y
- 47.25%
- 3Y*
- 21.70%
- 5Y*
- 6.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
EUDV
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 2.54%
- 6M
- 4.02%
- 1Y
- 0.36%
- 3Y*
- 7.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.73%
- 10Y*
- 5.31%
EFNL vs. EUDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFNL iShares MSCI Finland ETF | 21.56% | 53.59% | -5.28% | -0.12% | -17.29% | 10.50% | 20.19% | 13.64% | -6.86% | 23.77% |
EUDV ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF | 2.54% | 14.05% | 0.03% | 20.41% | -24.87% | 19.56% | 5.81% | 25.89% | -11.12% | 21.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFNL and EUDV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2015 | 0.67 |
The correlation between EFNL and EUDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EFNL vs. EUDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFNL
EUDV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
EFNL
EUDV
Technology
EFNL
EUDV
Industrials
EFNL
EUDV
Consumer Cyclical
EFNL
EUDV
-
Basic Materials
EFNL
EUDV
Energy
EFNL
EUDV
Utilities
EFNL
EUDV
Healthcare
EFNL
EUDV
Consumer Defensive
EFNL
EUDV
Communication Services
EFNL
EUDV
Real Estate
EFNL
EUDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFNL vs. EUDV — Risk / Return Rank
EFNL
EUDV
EFNL vs. EUDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) and ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF (EUDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFNL | EUDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.75 | 0.03 | +2.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.59 | 0.13 | +3.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.02 | +0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.19 | 0.07 | +6.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.92 | 0.18 | +21.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFNL | EUDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75 | 0.03 | +2.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.17 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.31 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.28 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
EFNL vs. EUDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFNL drawdown since its inception was -38.70%, roughly equal to the maximum EUDV drawdown of -37.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFNL and EUDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFNL | EUDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.70% | -37.51% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.92% | -10.63% | +2.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.19% | -13.69% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.70% | -37.51% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.70% | -37.51% | -1.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.42% | +3.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.93% | -8.61% | -2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 4.21% | -1.97% |
Volatility
EFNL vs. EUDV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) has a higher volatility of 7.05% compared to ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF (EUDV) at 4.48%. This indicates that EFNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFNL | EUDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.05% | 4.48% | +2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.86% | 11.10% | +2.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.30% | 14.01% | +3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.60% | 16.13% | +3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 17.42% | +2.67% |
EFNL vs. EUDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFNL has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than EUDV's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFNL vs. EUDV - Dividend Comparison
EFNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than EUDV's 1.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFNL iShares MSCI Finland ETF | 2.79% | 3.40% | 5.05% | 4.31% | 5.94% | 2.29% | 2.94% | 5.70% | 3.83% | 3.30% | 2.40% | 1.57% |
EUDV ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF | 1.69% | 1.74% | 1.92% | 1.87% | 1.77% | 2.30% | 1.27% | 2.20% | 2.22% | 2.33% | 2.53% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFNL and EUDV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFNL has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to EUDV (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFNL dropped -38.70% vs EUDV's -37.51%.
On 10-year performance, EFNL leads with 10.12% vs 5.31% for EUDV. On fees, EFNL is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, EUDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EFNL has performed better with a 10.12% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFNL is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EUDV.
EFNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.69% for EUDV.
EFNL tracks MSCI Finland IMI 25/50 Index, while EUDV tracks MSCI Europe Dividend Masters Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EFNL and 0.55% for EUDV.
EFNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFNL and EUDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer