PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFG vs. VSS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFG vs. VSS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFG achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly lower than VSS's 7.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EFG having a 8.09% annualized return and VSS not far behind at 7.98%.


EFG

1D
1.13%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
6.44%
6M
7.52%
1Y
11.82%
3Y*
10.54%
5Y*
3.87%
10Y*
8.09%

VSS

1D
0.02%
1M
-4.88%
YTD
7.74%
6M
10.30%
1Y
22.83%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
5.25%
10Y*
7.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFG vs. VSS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
6.44%20.70%1.53%17.55%-23.12%11.01%17.85%27.47%-12.93%28.86%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
7.74%29.61%2.94%15.52%-21.48%13.05%11.81%21.36%-18.48%30.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EFG and VSS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2009

0.91

The correlation between EFG and VSS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFG vs. VSS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFG
VSS

Industrials

29.6%
18.7%

Technology

18.1%
13.3%

Healthcare

14.2%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
9.3%

Financial Services

10.6%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
3.4%

Communication Services

4.8%
2.3%

Basic Materials

4.6%
12.1%

Utilities

1.1%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.0%
7.3%

Energy

0.2%
4.9%

Industrials

EFG
29.6%
VSS
18.7%

Technology

EFG
18.1%
VSS
13.3%

Healthcare

EFG
14.2%
VSS
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EFG
10.7%
VSS
9.3%

Financial Services

EFG
10.6%
VSS
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

EFG
5.1%
VSS
3.4%

Communication Services

EFG
4.8%
VSS
2.3%

Basic Materials

EFG
4.6%
VSS
12.1%

Utilities

EFG
1.1%
VSS
2.5%

Real Estate

EFG
1.0%
VSS
7.3%

Energy

EFG
0.2%
VSS
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFG vs. VSS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFG
EFG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
EFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFG Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
EFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

VSS
VSS Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
VSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSS Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFG vs. VSS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFGVSSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.28

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

1.97

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

7.54

-4.12

EFG vs. VSS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the VSS Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFG and VSS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFGVSSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

1.50

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.32

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.46

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.54

-0.25

Drawdowns

EFG vs. VSS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFG drawdown since its inception was -58.40%, which is greater than VSS's maximum drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFG and VSS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFGVSSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.40%

-43.51%

-14.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.78%

-11.62%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

-15.73%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.78%

-33.93%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.78%

-43.51%

+7.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-5.08%

+2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-9.64%

-2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

3.04%

+0.43%

Volatility

EFG vs. VSS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) have volatilities of 5.78% and 5.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFGVSSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

5.87%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

13.18%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.48%

15.28%

+2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.18%

16.53%

+1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.73%

17.30%

+0.43%

EFG vs. VSS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VSS's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFG vs. VSS - Dividend Comparison

EFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than VSS's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
2.37%2.53%1.64%1.63%1.27%1.54%0.85%1.69%1.98%1.56%2.20%1.75%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
3.15%3.39%3.44%3.14%2.30%2.74%1.90%3.25%2.80%2.83%2.93%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFG and VSS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSS has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to EFG (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFG dropped -58.40% vs VSS's -43.51%.

On 10-year performance, EFG leads with 8.09% vs 7.98% for VSS. On fees, VSS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EFG has performed better with a 8.09% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EFG.

VSS has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 2.37% for EFG.

EFG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VSS is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. EFG tracks MSCI EAFE Growth Index, while VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EFG and 0.07% for VSS.

VSS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFG and VSS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer