EFG vs. VSS
EFG (iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF) and VSS (Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Growth Index, while VSS is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFG returned 8.09%/yr vs 7.98%/yr for VSS. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EFG charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VSS.
Performance
EFG vs. VSS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFG achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly lower than VSS's 7.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EFG having a 8.09% annualized return and VSS not far behind at 7.98%.
EFG
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 6.44%
- 6M
- 7.52%
- 1Y
- 11.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.54%
- 5Y*
- 3.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.09%
VSS
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- 7.74%
- 6M
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 22.83%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- 7.98%
EFG vs. VSS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF | 6.44% | 20.70% | 1.53% | 17.55% | -23.12% | 11.01% | 17.85% | 27.47% | -12.93% | 28.86% |
VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF | 7.74% | 29.61% | 2.94% | 15.52% | -21.48% | 13.05% | 11.81% | 21.36% | -18.48% | 30.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFG and VSS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2009 | 0.91 |
The correlation between EFG and VSS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFG vs. VSS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFG
VSS
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Industrials
EFG
VSS
Technology
EFG
VSS
Healthcare
EFG
VSS
Consumer Cyclical
EFG
VSS
Financial Services
EFG
VSS
Consumer Defensive
EFG
VSS
Communication Services
EFG
VSS
Basic Materials
EFG
VSS
Utilities
EFG
VSS
Real Estate
EFG
VSS
Energy
EFG
VSS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFG vs. VSS — Risk / Return Rank
EFG
VSS
EFG vs. VSS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFG | VSS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.28 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 1.97 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 7.54 | -4.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFG | VSS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 1.50 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.32 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.54 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
EFG vs. VSS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFG drawdown since its inception was -58.40%, which is greater than VSS's maximum drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFG and VSS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFG | VSS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.40% | -43.51% | -14.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.78% | -11.62% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.87% | -15.73% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.78% | -33.93% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.78% | -43.51% | +7.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.28% | -5.08% | +2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -9.64% | -2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 3.04% | +0.43% |
Volatility
EFG vs. VSS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) have volatilities of 5.78% and 5.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFG | VSS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.78% | 5.87% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.82% | 13.18% | +1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.48% | 15.28% | +2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 16.53% | +1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 17.30% | +0.43% |
EFG vs. VSS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VSS's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFG vs. VSS - Dividend Comparison
EFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than VSS's 3.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF | 2.37% | 2.53% | 1.64% | 1.63% | 1.27% | 1.54% | 0.85% | 1.69% | 1.98% | 1.56% | 2.20% | 1.75% |
VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF | 3.15% | 3.39% | 3.44% | 3.14% | 2.30% | 2.74% | 1.90% | 3.25% | 2.80% | 2.83% | 2.93% | 2.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFG and VSS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VSS has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to EFG (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFG dropped -58.40% vs VSS's -43.51%.
On 10-year performance, EFG leads with 8.09% vs 7.98% for VSS. On fees, VSS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EFG has performed better with a 8.09% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VSS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EFG.
VSS has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 2.37% for EFG.
EFG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VSS is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. EFG tracks MSCI EAFE Growth Index, while VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EFG and 0.07% for VSS.
VSS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFG and VSS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer