PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFG vs. VBK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFG vs. VBK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFG achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly lower than VBK's 18.58% return. Over the past 10 years, EFG has underperformed VBK with an annualized return of 8.89%, while VBK has yielded a comparatively higher 12.54% annualized return.


EFG

1D
1.13%
1M
0.94%
YTD
8.93%
6M
8.22%
1Y
15.38%
3Y*
11.75%
5Y*
4.35%
10Y*
8.89%

VBK

1D
0.97%
1M
1.44%
YTD
18.58%
6M
15.61%
1Y
32.21%
3Y*
18.18%
5Y*
4.81%
10Y*
12.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFG vs. VBK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
8.93%20.70%1.53%17.55%-23.12%11.01%17.85%27.47%-12.93%28.86%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
18.58%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%35.44%32.75%-5.70%21.87%

Correlation

The correlation between EFG and VBK is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2005

0.75

The correlation between EFG and VBK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFG vs. VBK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFG
VBK

Industrials

28.3%
24.6%

Technology

20.3%
27.2%

Healthcare

13.2%
14.4%

Financial Services

11.3%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
7.9%

Basic Materials

6.0%
2.7%

Communication Services

5.2%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
2.7%

Utilities

1.5%
1.3%

Real Estate

0.7%
3.5%

Energy

0.5%
4.4%

Industrials

EFG
28.3%
VBK
24.6%

Technology

EFG
20.3%
VBK
27.2%

Healthcare

EFG
13.2%
VBK
14.4%

Financial Services

EFG
11.3%
VBK
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EFG
9.1%
VBK
7.9%

Basic Materials

EFG
6.0%
VBK
2.7%

Communication Services

EFG
5.2%
VBK
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

EFG
3.7%
VBK
2.7%

Utilities

EFG
1.5%
VBK
1.3%

Real Estate

EFG
0.7%
VBK
3.5%

Energy

EFG
0.5%
VBK
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFG vs. VBK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFG
EFG Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
EFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFG Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
EFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFG vs. VBK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFGVBKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.27

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

2.83

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.43

10.59

-6.16

EFG vs. VBK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the VBK Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFG and VBK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFG vs. VBK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFG drawdown since its inception was -58.40%, roughly equal to the maximum VBK drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFG and VBK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFGVBKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.40%

-58.68%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.78%

-11.44%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

-27.54%

+10.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.78%

-38.39%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.78%

-38.70%

+2.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-0.08%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-10.13%

-1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

3.05%

+0.43%

Volatility

EFG vs. VBK - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) have volatilities of 7.04% and 6.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFGVBKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.04%

6.97%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.67%

15.52%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.11%

20.07%

-1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.33%

23.63%

-5.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

22.91%

-5.32%

EFG vs. VBK - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VBK's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFG vs. VBK - Dividend Comparison

EFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than VBK's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
2.26%2.53%1.64%1.63%1.27%1.54%0.85%1.69%1.98%1.56%2.20%1.75%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.44%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFG and VBK have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFG has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to VBK (6.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFG dropped -58.40% vs VBK's -58.68%.

On 10-year performance, VBK leads with 12.54% vs 8.89% for EFG. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBK has performed better with a 12.54% return vs 8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EFG.

EFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 0.44% for VBK.

EFG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VBK is Small Cap Growth Equities. EFG tracks MSCI EAFE Growth Index, while VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EFG and 0.05% for VBK.

VBK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFG and VBK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer