PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAX vs. DMXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAX vs. DMXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAX achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly lower than DMXF's 11.52% return.


EFAX

1D
-0.83%
1M
3.93%
YTD
6.64%
6M
9.20%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*

DMXF

1D
-0.56%
1M
5.69%
YTD
11.52%
6M
13.01%
1Y
19.38%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAX vs. DMXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
6.64%31.30%4.78%18.02%-16.72%10.50%20.63%
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
11.52%22.07%3.99%20.52%-19.25%10.90%23.13%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAX and DMXF is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.94

The correlation between EFAX and DMXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFAX vs. DMXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFAX
DMXF

Financial Services

18.6%
31.6%

Technology

11.6%
18.3%

Industrials

9.5%
16.3%

Healthcare

9.0%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
4.6%

Basic Materials

3.9%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
2.3%

Communication Services

3.2%
7.0%

Real Estate

1.6%
3.9%

Energy

1.5%

-

Utilities

1.2%
0.6%

Financial Services

EFAX
18.6%
DMXF
31.6%

Technology

EFAX
11.6%
DMXF
18.3%

Industrials

EFAX
9.5%
DMXF
16.3%

Healthcare

EFAX
9.0%
DMXF
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EFAX
6.1%
DMXF
4.6%

Basic Materials

EFAX
3.9%
DMXF
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

EFAX
3.8%
DMXF
2.3%

Communication Services

EFAX
3.2%
DMXF
7.0%

Real Estate

EFAX
1.6%
DMXF
3.9%

Energy

EFAX
1.5%
DMXF

-

Utilities

EFAX
1.2%
DMXF
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAX vs. DMXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAX
EFAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

DMXF
DMXF Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
DMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAX vs. DMXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFAXDMXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.22

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.64

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.61

6.16

-0.55

EFAX vs. DMXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the DMXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAX and DMXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFAXDMXFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

1.21

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.39

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.65

-0.12

Drawdowns

EFAX vs. DMXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum DMXF drawdown of -34.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAX and DMXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFAXDMXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-34.52%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.38%

-11.84%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.52%

-16.54%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.67%

-34.52%

+2.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-0.56%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-7.67%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.15%

+0.19%

Volatility

EFAX vs. DMXF - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) have volatilities of 5.24% and 5.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFAXDMXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

5.13%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.11%

13.29%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67%

16.07%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

17.68%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

17.25%

-0.15%

EFAX vs. DMXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DMXF's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EFAX vs. DMXF - Dividend Comparison

EFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than DMXF's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
4.35%4.85%2.92%2.29%2.37%1.91%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
3.22%3.31%2.74%2.71%2.81%2.58%1.69%2.71%3.05%2.89%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, EFAX and DMXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EFAX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to DMXF (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAX dropped -32.53% vs DMXF's -34.52%.

On 5-year performance, EFAX leads with 7.48% vs 6.83% for DMXF. On fees, DMXF is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DMXF has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EFAX has performed better with a 7.48% return vs 6.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DMXF is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAX.

DMXF has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 3.22% for EFAX.

EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while DMXF tracks MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAX and 0.12% for DMXF.

DMXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAX and DMXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer