EFAX vs. DMXF
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF).
EFAX and DMXF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFAX is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index. It was launched on Oct 24, 2016. DMXF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2020. Both EFAX and DMXF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EFAX vs. DMXF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EFAX vs. DMXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAX SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF | -1.39% | 31.30% | 4.78% | 18.02% | -16.72% | 10.50% | 20.63% |
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | 0.39% | 22.07% | 3.99% | 20.52% | -19.25% | 10.90% | 23.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAX achieves a -1.39% return, which is significantly lower than DMXF's 0.39% return.
EFAX
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- -8.98%
- YTD
- -1.39%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- 19.98%
- 3Y*
- 13.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- —
DMXF
- 1D
- 3.51%
- 1M
- -8.10%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- 17.59%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFAX vs. DMXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DMXF's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
EFAX vs. DMXF — Risk / Return Rank
EFAX
DMXF
EFAX vs. DMXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFAX | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 0.94 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 1.44 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 1.44 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.02 | 5.43 | +0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFAX | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 0.94 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.33 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.56 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAX and DMXF is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EFAX vs. DMXF - Dividend Comparison
EFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than DMXF's 4.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAX SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 3.35% | 3.31% | 2.74% | 2.71% | 2.81% | 2.58% | 1.69% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 2.89% | 0.26% |
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | 4.83% | 4.85% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 2.37% | 1.91% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EFAX vs. DMXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum DMXF drawdown of -34.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAX and DMXF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAX | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -34.52% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -11.84% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.67% | -34.52% | +2.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.22% | -8.42% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -7.83% | +0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.15% | -0.01% |
Volatility
EFAX vs. DMXF - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) have volatilities of 8.20% and 8.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EFAX | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.20% | 8.07% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.35% | 11.97% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.04% | 18.85% | -0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.43% | 17.52% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 17.17% | -0.13% |