EFAX vs. DMXF
EFAX (SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and DMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - EFAX tracks the MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index while DMXF tracks the MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFAX returned 7.48%/yr vs 6.83%/yr for DMXF. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EFAX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DMXF.
Performance
EFAX vs. DMXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAX achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly lower than DMXF's 11.52% return.
EFAX
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 6.64%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 18.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- —
DMXF
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 19.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- —
EFAX vs. DMXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAX SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 6.64% | 31.30% | 4.78% | 18.02% | -16.72% | 10.50% | 20.63% |
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | 11.52% | 22.07% | 3.99% | 20.52% | -19.25% | 10.90% | 23.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAX and DMXF is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020 | 0.94 |
The correlation between EFAX and DMXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFAX vs. DMXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFAX
DMXF
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Energy
-
Utilities
Financial Services
EFAX
DMXF
Technology
EFAX
DMXF
Industrials
EFAX
DMXF
Healthcare
EFAX
DMXF
Consumer Cyclical
EFAX
DMXF
Basic Materials
EFAX
DMXF
Consumer Defensive
EFAX
DMXF
Communication Services
EFAX
DMXF
Real Estate
EFAX
DMXF
Energy
EFAX
DMXF
-
Utilities
EFAX
DMXF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFAX vs. DMXF — Risk / Return Rank
EFAX
DMXF
EFAX vs. DMXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFAX | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.22 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 1.64 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 6.16 | -0.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFAX | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.21 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.39 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.65 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
EFAX vs. DMXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum DMXF drawdown of -34.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAX and DMXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAX | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -34.52% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -11.84% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.52% | -16.54% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.67% | -34.52% | +2.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -0.56% | -1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -7.67% | +0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 3.15% | +0.19% |
Volatility
EFAX vs. DMXF - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) have volatilities of 5.24% and 5.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFAX | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 5.13% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.11% | 13.29% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.67% | 16.07% | -0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 17.68% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 17.25% | -0.15% |
EFAX vs. DMXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DMXF's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EFAX vs. DMXF - Dividend Comparison
EFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than DMXF's 4.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | 4.35% | 4.85% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 2.37% | 1.91% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFAX SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 3.22% | 3.31% | 2.74% | 2.71% | 2.81% | 2.58% | 1.69% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 2.89% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, EFAX and DMXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EFAX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to DMXF (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAX dropped -32.53% vs DMXF's -34.52%.
On 5-year performance, EFAX leads with 7.48% vs 6.83% for DMXF. On fees, DMXF is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DMXF has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EFAX has performed better with a 7.48% return vs 6.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DMXF is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAX.
DMXF has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 3.22% for EFAX.
EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while DMXF tracks MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAX and 0.12% for DMXF.
DMXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFAX and DMXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer