PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAV vs. INFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAV vs. INFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EFAV

1D
0.88%
1M
3.93%
6M
6.18%
YTD
7.56%
1Y
13.34%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*
6.33%

INFR

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAV vs. INFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
7.56%26.00%5.30%12.52%0.28%
INFR
ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF
1.41%24.00%-6.23%5.20%-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAV and INFR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between EFAV and INFR has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EFAV vs. INFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFAV
INFR

Financial Services

19.4%

-

Industrials

15.9%
27.5%

Healthcare

12.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

11.9%

-

Communication Services

9.6%

-

Utilities

8.8%
68.5%

Energy

8.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%

-

Technology

4.6%

-

Real Estate

3.0%
4.1%

Basic Materials

1.5%

-

Financial Services

EFAV
19.4%
INFR

-

Industrials

EFAV
15.9%
INFR
27.5%

Healthcare

EFAV
12.0%
INFR

-

Consumer Defensive

EFAV
11.9%
INFR

-

Communication Services

EFAV
9.6%
INFR

-

Utilities

EFAV
8.8%
INFR
68.5%

Energy

EFAV
8.3%
INFR

-

Consumer Cyclical

EFAV
5.0%
INFR

-

Technology

EFAV
4.6%
INFR

-

Real Estate

EFAV
3.0%
INFR
4.1%

Basic Materials

EFAV
1.5%
INFR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAV vs. INFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

INFR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAV vs. INFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFAVINFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

EFAV vs. INFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFAV vs. INFR - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFAVINFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

Volatility

EFAV vs. INFR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFAVINFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.02%

EFAV vs. INFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFAV vs. INFR - Dividend Comparison

EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, while INFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
3.14%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%
INFR
ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF
1.71%2.52%2.36%3.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAV and INFR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for INFR.

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 1.71% for INFR.

EFAV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while INFR is Energy Equities. EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) Index, while INFR tracks RARE Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ClearBridge. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAV and 0.59% for INFR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAV and INFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer