EFAV vs. CASH.TO
EFAV (iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF) and CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFAV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index, while CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. EFAV is passively managed, while CASH.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EFAV returned 13.16%/yr vs 2.06%/yr for CASH.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EFAV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for CASH.TO.
Performance
EFAV vs. CASH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EFAV is traded in USD, while CASH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CASH.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a 5.34% return, which is significantly higher than CASH.TO's -1.14% return.
EFAV
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 5.34%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 9.77%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.24%
- 10Y*
- 6.51%
CASH.TO
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- -1.14%
- 6M
- -0.44%
- 1Y
- -0.04%
- 3Y*
- 2.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFAV vs. CASH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 5.34% | 26.00% | 5.30% | 12.52% | -15.11% | 0.29% |
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | -1.20% | 7.36% | -3.63% | 7.67% | -3.72% | -2.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAV and CASH.TO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFAV vs. CASH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EFAV
CASH.TO
EFAV vs. CASH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFAV | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.00 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | -0.01 | +1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.00 | -0.02 | +4.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFAV vs. CASH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, which is greater than CASH.TO's maximum drawdown of -9.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and CASH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAV | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.56% | -9.29% | -18.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | -3.03% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.75% | -7.69% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.23% | -2.75% | -1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -2.80% | -1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 1.57% | +0.89% |
Volatility
EFAV vs. CASH.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) at 0.77%. This indicates that EFAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CASH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFAV | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 0.77% | +2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.41% | 3.22% | +5.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.55% | 4.41% | +6.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.82% | 6.24% | +5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 6.24% | +6.96% |
EFAV vs. CASH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CASH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EFAV vs. CASH.TO - Dividend Comparison
EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than CASH.TO's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 2.19% | 2.53% | 4.37% | 5.05% | 2.30% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 3.04% | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.08% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 1.33% | 4.19% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 3.94% | 2.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFAV and CASH.TO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CASH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CASH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAV.
EFAV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CASH.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAV and 0.11% for CASH.TO.
Find the right allocation for EFAV and CASH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer