EFAS vs. YCS
EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - EFAS is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFAS returned 14.43%/yr vs 23.55%/yr for YCS. Their -0.09 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EFAS charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
EFAS vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAS achieves a 20.56% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.29% return.
EFAS
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 6.31%
- 6M
- 14.73%
- YTD
- 20.56%
- 1Y
- 32.01%
- 3Y*
- 25.41%
- 5Y*
- 14.43%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.80%
YCS
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- 6M
- 9.33%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 1Y
- 25.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.34%
- 5Y*
- 23.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $411.25K | $354.75K | $345.09K | |
| $1.53M | $2.43M | $1.42M |
EFAS vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 20.56% | 46.83% | 3.07% | 14.65% | -8.00% | 12.75% | -5.42% | 14.60% | -11.60% | 22.76% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 7.29% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAS and YCS is -0.30, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2016 | -0.09 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between EFAS and YCS has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.09 to -0.30, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFAS vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
EFAS
YCS
EFAS vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFAS | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.23 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.07 | 2.35 | +3.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.92 | 8.93 | +5.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFAS vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAS drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAS and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAS | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.38% | -49.56% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.30% | -8.30% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.84% | -23.05% | +11.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.81% | -27.32% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -5.68% | +4.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -19.75% | +12.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.64% | -0.49% |
Volatility
EFAS vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) is 2.71%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that EFAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFAS | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | 5.30% | -2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.68% | 11.65% | -2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.95% | 16.85% | -5.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 21.16% | -5.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 18.61% | -0.38% |
EFAS vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFAS vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 4.52% | 4.83% | 6.76% | 6.33% | 7.28% | 5.19% | 4.34% | 5.75% | 6.63% | 6.15% | 0.21% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFAS and YCS have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YCS has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to EFAS (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAS dropped -44.38% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.55% vs 14.43% for EFAS. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.55% return vs 14.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFAS is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.52%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
EFAS is categorized as Dividend, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EFAS and 1.00% for YCS.
EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFAS and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer