EFAS vs. PNGAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) and PNGAX (Putnam International Value Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, EFAS returned 12.04%/yr vs 10.95%/yr for PNGAX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFAS charges 0.56%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for PNGAX.

Performance

EFAS vs. PNGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAS achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly higher than PNGAX's 9.56% return.

EFAS

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: 12.96%
• 6M: 17.29%
• 1Y: 28.68%
• 3Y*: 24.47%
• 5Y*: 12.04%
• 10Y*: —

PNGAX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 3.00%
• YTD: 9.56%
• 6M: 12.44%
• 1Y: 22.48%
• 3Y*: 19.26%
• 5Y*: 10.95%
• 10Y*: 9.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAS vs. PNGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	12.96%	46.83%	3.07%	14.65%	-8.00%	12.75%	-5.42%	14.60%	-11.60%	22.76%
PNGAX Putnam International Value Fund	9.56%	34.66%	5.86%	18.50%	-6.85%	14.24%	4.19%	19.96%	-18.02%	24.09%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAS and PNGAX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2016	0.78

The correlation between EFAS and PNGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EFAS vs. PNGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 81
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 75

PNGAX

PNGAX Risk / Return Rank: 30
PNGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
PNGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
PNGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
PNGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
PNGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAS vs. PNGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EFAS	PNGAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	1.55	+1.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.83	2.20	+1.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.28	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.44	2.10	+3.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.48	7.74	+6.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EFAS vs. PNGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAS Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the PNGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAS and PNGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EFAS	PNGAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	1.55	+1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	0.70	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.35	+0.21

Drawdowns

EFAS vs. PNGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAS drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, smaller than the maximum PNGAX drawdown of -64.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAS and PNGAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFAS	PNGAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.38%	-64.78%	+20.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.30%	-10.51%	+5.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.84%	-13.87%	+2.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.81%	-27.37%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.01%	-0.63%	-2.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.08%	-15.82%	+8.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	2.84%	-0.85%

Volatility

EFAS vs. PNGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) is 2.96%, while Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that EFAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFAS	PNGAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.96%	4.18%	-1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.20%	11.41%	-3.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.60%	14.28%	-3.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.59%	15.75%	-0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.33%	17.06%	+1.27%

EFAS vs. PNGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than PNGAX's 1.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFAS vs. PNGAX - Dividend Comparison

EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than PNGAX's 2.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	5.05%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%	0.00%
PNGAX Putnam International Value Fund	2.71%	2.97%	3.89%	2.35%	1.63%	5.70%	1.84%	3.91%	4.34%	1.11%	2.23%	1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFAS and PNGAX in my portfolio?

EFAS and PNGAX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFAS or PNGAX?

PNGAX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to EFAS (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAS dropped -44.38% vs PNGAX's -64.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.