PNGAX vs. VIVAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) and Vanguard Value Index Fund (VIVAX).
PNGAX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on Jul 31, 1996. VIVAX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Nov 2, 1992.
Performance
PNGAX vs. VIVAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PNGAX vs. VIVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNGAX Putnam International Value Fund | 2.61% | 34.66% | 5.86% | 18.50% | -6.85% | 14.24% | 4.19% | 19.96% | -18.02% | 24.09% |
VIVAX Vanguard Value Index Fund | 3.28% | 14.50% | 15.85% | 9.08% | -2.18% | 26.32% | 2.18% | 25.66% | -5.56% | 16.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PNGAX achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly lower than VIVAX's 3.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PNGAX has underperformed VIVAX with an annualized return of 9.38%, while VIVAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.60% annualized return.
PNGAX
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- -4.78%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 6M
- 5.73%
- 1Y
- 23.99%
- 3Y*
- 17.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
VIVAX
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -4.62%
- YTD
- 3.28%
- 6M
- 6.06%
- 1Y
- 16.15%
- 3Y*
- 14.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PNGAX vs. VIVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PNGAX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VIVAX's 0.17% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PNGAX vs. VIVAX — Risk / Return Rank
PNGAX
VIVAX
PNGAX vs. VIVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) and Vanguard Value Index Fund (VIVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PNGAX | VIVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 1.08 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.95 | 1.54 | +0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.23 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 1.52 | +0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.77 | 6.83 | +0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PNGAX | VIVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.08 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.76 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.69 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.54 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between PNGAX and VIVAX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PNGAX vs. VIVAX - Dividend Comparison
PNGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than VIVAX's 1.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNGAX Putnam International Value Fund | 2.89% | 2.97% | 3.89% | 2.35% | 1.63% | 5.70% | 1.84% | 3.91% | 4.34% | 1.11% | 2.23% | 1.09% |
VIVAX Vanguard Value Index Fund | 1.90% | 1.42% | 2.19% | 2.33% | 2.39% | 2.02% | 2.43% | 2.39% | 2.59% | 2.18% | 2.33% | 2.46% |
Drawdowns
PNGAX vs. VIVAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNGAX drawdown since its inception was -64.78%, which is greater than VIVAX's maximum drawdown of -59.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNGAX and VIVAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNGAX | VIVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.78% | -59.38% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -11.28% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.37% | -17.17% | -10.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.58% | -36.81% | -4.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.94% | -4.83% | -2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.89% | -8.11% | -7.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 2.51% | +0.44% |
Volatility
PNGAX vs. VIVAX - Volatility Comparison
Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) has a higher volatility of 7.24% compared to Vanguard Value Index Fund (VIVAX) at 3.81%. This indicates that PNGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PNGAX | VIVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.24% | 3.81% | +3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.72% | 7.71% | +3.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.49% | 14.89% | +1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 13.92% | +1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 16.74% | +0.30% |