PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAS vs. IDEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAS vs. IDEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAS achieves a 13.61% return, which is significantly higher than IDEV's 9.92% return.


EFAS

1D
-0.50%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
13.61%
6M
18.42%
1Y
28.44%
3Y*
24.71%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*

IDEV

1D
0.62%
1M
2.82%
YTD
9.92%
6M
13.26%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAS vs. IDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
13.61%46.83%3.07%14.65%-8.00%12.75%-5.42%14.60%-11.60%17.63%
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
9.92%32.56%4.54%17.36%-14.99%13.00%8.32%23.12%-14.10%17.29%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAS and IDEV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017

0.75

The correlation between EFAS and IDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFAS vs. IDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFAS
IDEV

Financial Services

30.1%
24.2%

Utilities

14.4%
3.7%

Energy

13.7%
5.9%

Real Estate

11.3%
2.9%

Industrials

9.9%
19.1%

Communication Services

8.6%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%
7.7%

Basic Materials

1.8%
8.0%

Healthcare

0.1%
8.6%

Technology

0.1%
9.9%

Financial Services

EFAS
30.1%
IDEV
24.2%

Utilities

EFAS
14.4%
IDEV
3.7%

Energy

EFAS
13.7%
IDEV
5.9%

Real Estate

EFAS
11.3%
IDEV
2.9%

Industrials

EFAS
9.9%
IDEV
19.1%

Communication Services

EFAS
8.6%
IDEV
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

EFAS
8.1%
IDEV
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EFAS
1.9%
IDEV
7.7%

Basic Materials

EFAS
1.8%
IDEV
8.0%

Healthcare

EFAS
0.1%
IDEV
8.6%

Technology

EFAS
0.1%
IDEV
9.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAS vs. IDEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

IDEV
IDEV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAS vs. IDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFASIDEVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.70

1.62

+1.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.79

2.31

+1.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.29

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.72

2.22

+3.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.34

8.73

+6.61

EFAS vs. IDEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAS Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the IDEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAS and IDEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFASIDEVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

1.62

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.55

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.55

+0.01

Drawdowns

EFAS vs. IDEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAS drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, which is greater than IDEV's maximum drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAS and IDEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFASIDEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.38%

-34.77%

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.30%

-11.20%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.84%

-13.41%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

-29.15%

+0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-0.08%

-2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

-6.57%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

2.85%

-0.87%

Volatility

EFAS vs. IDEV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) is 3.08%, while iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that EFAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFASIDEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

4.71%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

12.07%

-3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.67%

14.52%

-3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.59%

16.26%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

17.27%

+1.06%

EFAS vs. IDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEV's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFAS vs. IDEV - Dividend Comparison

EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than IDEV's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
4.59%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
3.10%3.40%3.30%3.07%2.69%3.05%2.00%3.18%3.16%1.54%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAS and IDEV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDEV has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to EFAS (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAS dropped -44.38% vs IDEV's -34.77%.

On 5-year performance, EFAS leads with 12.25% vs 8.88% for IDEV. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 12.25% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for EFAS.

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 3.10% for IDEV.

EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index, while IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for EFAS and 0.05% for IDEV.

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAS and IDEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer