EFAS vs. FDD
EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) and FDD (First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EFAS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index, while FDD is a Europe Equities fund tracking the STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFAS returned 12.41%/yr vs 11.32%/yr for FDD. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFAS charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FDD.
Performance
EFAS vs. FDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAS achieves a 15.45% return, which is significantly higher than FDD's 13.65% return.
EFAS
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 15.45%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- 1Y
- 29.12%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- 12.41%
- 10Y*
- —
FDD
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 13.65%
- 6M
- 17.76%
- 1Y
- 33.97%
- 3Y*
- 26.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
EFAS vs. FDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 15.45% | 46.83% | 3.07% | 14.65% | -8.00% | 12.75% | -5.42% | 14.60% | -11.60% | 22.76% |
FDD First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund | 13.65% | 62.50% | 0.28% | 14.16% | -16.14% | 16.03% | -3.80% | 23.79% | -8.98% | 19.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAS and FDD is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2016 | 0.79 |
The correlation between EFAS and FDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFAS vs. FDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFAS
FDD
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
EFAS
FDD
Utilities
EFAS
FDD
Energy
EFAS
FDD
Real Estate
EFAS
FDD
Industrials
EFAS
FDD
Communication Services
EFAS
FDD
Consumer Defensive
EFAS
FDD
Consumer Cyclical
EFAS
FDD
Basic Materials
EFAS
FDD
Healthcare
EFAS
FDD
-
Technology
EFAS
FDD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFAS vs. FDD — Risk / Return Rank
EFAS
FDD
EFAS vs. FDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFAS | FDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.36 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.64 | 3.58 | +2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.75 | 11.88 | +2.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFAS vs. FDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAS drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, smaller than the maximum FDD drawdown of -74.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAS and FDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAS | FDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.38% | -74.77% | +30.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.30% | -9.39% | +4.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.84% | -13.06% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.81% | -35.11% | +6.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.40% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -35.41% | +28.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 2.83% | -0.81% |
Volatility
EFAS vs. FDD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) is 3.35%, while First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that EFAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFAS | FDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | 5.91% | -2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.58% | 12.98% | -4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.87% | 15.93% | -5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 18.48% | -2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 20.16% | -1.84% |
EFAS vs. FDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than FDD's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFAS vs. FDD - Dividend Comparison
EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than FDD's 3.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 4.62% | 4.83% | 6.76% | 6.33% | 7.28% | 5.19% | 4.34% | 5.75% | 6.63% | 6.15% | 0.21% | 0.00% |
FDD First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund | 3.48% | 3.99% | 7.65% | 6.85% | 6.07% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 4.69% | 5.05% | 2.78% | 4.88% | 4.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFAS and FDD have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDD has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to EFAS (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAS dropped -44.38% vs FDD's -74.77%.
On 5-year performance, EFAS leads with 12.41% vs 11.32% for FDD. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 12.41% return vs 11.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FDD.
EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 3.48% for FDD.
EFAS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FDD is Europe Equities. EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index, while FDD tracks STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for EFAS and 0.58% for FDD.
EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFAS and FDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer