PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAS vs. FDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAS vs. FDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAS achieves a 15.45% return, which is significantly higher than FDD's 13.65% return.


EFAS

1D
0.16%
1M
0.53%
YTD
15.45%
6M
18.87%
1Y
29.12%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*

FDD

1D
0.81%
1M
1.80%
YTD
13.65%
6M
17.76%
1Y
33.97%
3Y*
26.21%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
10.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAS vs. FDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
15.45%46.83%3.07%14.65%-8.00%12.75%-5.42%14.60%-11.60%22.76%
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
13.65%62.50%0.28%14.16%-16.14%16.03%-3.80%23.79%-8.98%19.07%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAS and FDD is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2016

0.79

The correlation between EFAS and FDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFAS vs. FDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFAS
FDD

Financial Services

30.1%
52.2%

Utilities

14.4%
6.0%

Energy

13.7%
10.8%

Real Estate

11.3%
3.5%

Industrials

9.9%
12.5%

Communication Services

8.6%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%
12.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.9%

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Technology

0.1%

-

Financial Services

EFAS
30.1%
FDD
52.2%

Utilities

EFAS
14.4%
FDD
6.0%

Energy

EFAS
13.7%
FDD
10.8%

Real Estate

EFAS
11.3%
FDD
3.5%

Industrials

EFAS
9.9%
FDD
12.5%

Communication Services

EFAS
8.6%
FDD
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

EFAS
8.1%
FDD
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EFAS
1.9%
FDD
12.3%

Basic Materials

EFAS
1.8%
FDD
2.9%

Healthcare

EFAS
0.1%
FDD

-

Technology

EFAS
0.1%
FDD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAS vs. FDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FDD
FDD Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDD Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAS vs. FDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFASFDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.36

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.64

3.58

+2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.75

11.88

+2.87

EFAS vs. FDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAS Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the FDD Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAS and FDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFAS vs. FDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAS drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, smaller than the maximum FDD drawdown of -74.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAS and FDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFASFDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.38%

-74.77%

+30.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.30%

-9.39%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.84%

-13.06%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

-35.11%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.40%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-35.41%

+28.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.83%

-0.81%

Volatility

EFAS vs. FDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) is 3.35%, while First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that EFAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFASFDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

5.91%

-2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.58%

12.98%

-4.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.87%

15.93%

-5.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.62%

18.48%

-2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

20.16%

-1.84%

EFAS vs. FDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than FDD's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFAS vs. FDD - Dividend Comparison

EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than FDD's 3.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
4.62%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%0.00%
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
3.48%3.99%7.65%6.85%6.07%3.44%4.01%4.69%5.05%2.78%4.88%4.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAS and FDD have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDD has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to EFAS (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAS dropped -44.38% vs FDD's -74.77%.

On 5-year performance, EFAS leads with 12.41% vs 11.32% for FDD. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 12.41% return vs 11.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FDD.

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 3.48% for FDD.

EFAS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FDD is Europe Equities. EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index, while FDD tracks STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for EFAS and 0.58% for FDD.

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAS and FDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer