PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAS vs. DGRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAS vs. DGRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAS achieves a 14.78% return, which is significantly lower than DGRE's 23.46% return.


EFAS

1D
0.30%
1M
-0.58%
6M
13.14%
YTD
14.78%
1Y
26.59%
3Y*
23.34%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*

DGRE

1D
-3.26%
1M
-3.93%
6M
18.21%
YTD
23.46%
1Y
41.62%
3Y*
19.85%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
8.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAS vs. DGRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
14.78%46.83%3.07%14.65%-8.00%12.75%-5.42%14.60%-11.60%22.76%
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
23.46%27.47%3.63%18.46%-21.86%2.55%10.85%21.12%-16.36%33.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAS and DGRE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2016

0.54

The correlation between EFAS and DGRE shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EFAS vs. DGRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFAS
DGRE

Financial Services

31.0%
17.8%

Utilities

13.7%
2.2%

Energy

13.1%
1.9%

Real Estate

11.4%
0.8%

Industrials

10.4%
11.8%

Communication Services

8.6%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%
5.5%

Basic Materials

1.7%
6.6%

Healthcare

0.1%
4.8%

Technology

0.1%
41.5%

Financial Services

EFAS
31.0%
DGRE
17.8%

Utilities

EFAS
13.7%
DGRE
2.2%

Energy

EFAS
13.1%
DGRE
1.9%

Real Estate

EFAS
11.4%
DGRE
0.8%

Industrials

EFAS
10.4%
DGRE
11.8%

Communication Services

EFAS
8.6%
DGRE
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

EFAS
8.1%
DGRE
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EFAS
1.9%
DGRE
5.5%

Basic Materials

EFAS
1.7%
DGRE
6.6%

Healthcare

EFAS
0.1%
DGRE
4.8%

Technology

EFAS
0.1%
DGRE
41.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAS vs. DGRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRE
DGRE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAS vs. DGRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFASDGREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.33

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.04

3.06

+1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.31

11.25

+1.06

EFAS vs. DGRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAS Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the DGRE Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAS and DGRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFAS vs. DGRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAS drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, which is greater than DGRE's maximum drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAS and DGRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFASDGREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.38%

-36.95%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.30%

-13.68%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.84%

-20.65%

+8.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

-33.43%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-8.73%

+7.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-11.94%

+4.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

3.71%

-1.54%

Volatility

EFAS vs. DGRE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) is 3.08%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a volatility of 10.85%. This indicates that EFAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFASDGREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

10.85%

-7.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

21.70%

-13.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

23.37%

-12.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

18.88%

-3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

19.87%

-1.60%

EFAS vs. DGRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRE's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFAS vs. DGRE - Dividend Comparison

EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than DGRE's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.34%1.65%1.90%2.22%4.38%2.56%2.11%2.32%2.71%3.12%3.18%3.01%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
4.75%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAS and DGRE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRE has higher volatility (10.85%) compared to EFAS (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAS dropped -44.38% vs DGRE's -36.95%.

On 5-year performance, EFAS leads with 12.99% vs 7.90% for DGRE. On fees, DGRE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 12.99% return vs 7.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EFAS.

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 1.34% for DGRE.

EFAS is categorized as Dividend, while DGRE is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EFAS and 0.32% for DGRE.

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAS and DGRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer