PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAS vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAS vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAS achieves a 13.61% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 79.50% return.


EFAS

1D
-0.50%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
13.61%
6M
18.42%
1Y
28.44%
3Y*
24.71%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*

DBE

1D
0.80%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
79.50%
6M
72.59%
1Y
82.31%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
19.20%
10Y*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAS vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
13.61%46.83%3.07%14.65%-8.00%12.75%-5.42%14.60%-11.60%22.76%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
79.50%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%19.72%-12.95%5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAS and DBE is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2016

0.23

The correlation between EFAS and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAS vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAS vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFASDBEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.70

2.37

+0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.79

2.91

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.39

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.72

6.10

-0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.34

11.98

+3.36

EFAS vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAS Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAS and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFASDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.37

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.66

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.09

+0.47

Drawdowns

EFAS vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAS drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAS and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFASDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.38%

-86.69%

+42.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.30%

-14.41%

+9.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.84%

-23.89%

+12.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

-38.74%

+9.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-31.85%

+29.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

-57.31%

+50.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

7.34%

-5.36%

Volatility

EFAS vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) is 3.08%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 13.47%. This indicates that EFAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFASDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

13.47%

-10.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

30.80%

-22.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.67%

35.02%

-24.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.59%

29.37%

-13.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

28.33%

-10.00%

EFAS vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFAS vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than DBE's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.15%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%0.00%0.00%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
4.59%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAS and DBE have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (13.47%) compared to EFAS (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAS dropped -44.38% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 19.20% vs 12.25% for EFAS. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 19.20% return vs 12.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 2.15% for DBE.

EFAS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for EFAS and 0.78% for DBE.

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAS and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer