EEV vs. UCO
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO).
EEV and UCO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EEV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-200%). It was launched on Nov 1, 2007. UCO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). It was launched on Nov 24, 2008. Both EEV and UCO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EEV vs. UCO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EEV vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | -11.20% | -43.35% | -8.08% | -13.08% | 37.05% | -4.99% | -48.93% | -30.87% | 24.06% | -49.03% |
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | 92.55% | -29.75% | 5.36% | -13.89% | 39.71% | 139.26% | -92.91% | 53.83% | -43.26% | 0.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEV achieves a -11.20% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 92.55% return. Over the past 10 years, EEV has underperformed UCO with an annualized return of -20.88%, while UCO has yielded a comparatively higher -9.67% annualized return.
EEV
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 12.41%
- YTD
- -11.20%
- 6M
- -15.97%
- 1Y
- -45.43%
- 3Y*
- -24.22%
- 5Y*
- -9.85%
- 10Y*
- -20.88%
UCO
- 1D
- -5.34%
- 1M
- 34.20%
- YTD
- 92.55%
- 6M
- 67.42%
- 1Y
- 37.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 21.35%
- 10Y*
- -9.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EEV vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EEV and UCO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
EEV vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank
EEV
UCO
EEV vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EEV | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | 0.66 | -1.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | 1.20 | -2.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.15 | -0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 1.08 | -1.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 1.80 | -2.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEV | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.13 | 0.66 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | 0.36 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.51 | -0.14 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.45 | -0.36 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between EEV and UCO is -0.36. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
EEV vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison
EEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, while UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | 4.87% | 5.40% | 4.45% | 3.45% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.34% | 0.38% |
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EEV vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEV drawdown since its inception was -99.83%, roughly equal to the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEV and UCO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEV | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.83% | -99.95% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.05% | -34.77% | -29.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.95% | -67.24% | -6.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.81% | -98.75% | +5.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.80% | -99.40% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.94% | -85.35% | -7.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.09% | 20.76% | +25.33% |
Volatility
EEV vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) is 19.43%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 25.64%. This indicates that EEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EEV | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.43% | 25.64% | -6.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.25% | 40.74% | -10.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.33% | 57.38% | -17.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.24% | 59.11% | -21.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.74% | 71.31% | -30.57% |