PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEV vs. EDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEV vs. EDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) and Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEV achieves a -35.58% return, which is significantly lower than EDC's 31.99% return. Over the past 10 years, EEV has underperformed EDC with an annualized return of -21.72%, while EDC has yielded a comparatively higher 2.93% annualized return.


EEV

1D
-0.68%
1M
2.43%
6M
-24.50%
YTD
-35.58%
1Y
-50.55%
3Y*
-30.58%
5Y*
-15.56%
10Y*
-21.72%
ALL TIME*
-25.41%

EDC

1D
1.14%
1M
-9.06%
6M
5.81%
YTD
31.99%
1Y
87.69%
3Y*
34.27%
5Y*
-2.72%
10Y*
2.93%
ALL TIME*
1.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.35M$6.32M$9.31M
$334.32K$274.53K$536.99K

EEV vs. EDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets
-35.58%-43.35%-8.08%-13.08%37.05%-4.99%-48.93%-30.87%24.06%-49.03%
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
31.99%94.58%-2.00%7.48%-60.25%-20.81%6.49%43.92%-49.87%138.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EEV and EDC is -0.99, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2008

-1.00

The correlation between EEV and EDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEV vs. EDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEV
EDC

Technology

43.6%
32.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
10.3%

Financial Services

8.0%
20.8%

Industrials

6.2%
7.3%

Basic Materials

6.1%
7.0%

Communication Services

5.7%
7.8%

Energy

3.3%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
3.2%

Healthcare

2.5%
3.2%

Utilities

2.0%
2.2%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.1%

Technology

EEV
43.6%
EDC
32.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EEV
8.1%
EDC
10.3%

Financial Services

EEV
8.0%
EDC
20.8%

Industrials

EEV
6.2%
EDC
7.3%

Basic Materials

EEV
6.1%
EDC
7.0%

Communication Services

EEV
5.7%
EDC
7.8%

Energy

EEV
3.3%
EDC
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

EEV
2.7%
EDC
3.2%

Healthcare

EEV
2.5%
EDC
3.2%

Utilities

EEV
2.0%
EDC
2.2%

Real Estate

EEV
0.9%
EDC
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEV vs. EDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EEV
EEV Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
EEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEV Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
EEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEV Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

EDC
EDC Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
EDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
EDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EEV vs. EDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) and Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEVEDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.25

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

2.20

-3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.48

6.17

-7.65

EEV vs. EDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEV Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the EDC Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEV and EDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEV vs. EDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEV drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, which is greater than EDC's maximum drawdown of -92.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEV and EDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEVEDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.88%

-92.54%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.73%

-40.06%

-17.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.51%

-49.48%

-28.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.14%

-77.83%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.39%

-87.01%

-6.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.86%

-71.98%

-27.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.04%

-65.37%

-27.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.15%

14.26%

+20.89%

Volatility

EEV vs. EDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) is 19.06%, while Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) has a volatility of 26.81%. This indicates that EEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEVEDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.06%

26.81%

-7.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.98%

67.22%

-22.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.54%

73.18%

-23.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.13%

59.42%

-19.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.77%

61.61%

-19.84%

EEV vs. EDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than EDC's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEV vs. EDC - Dividend Comparison

EEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than EDC's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
1.50%1.79%3.94%3.54%0.00%0.18%0.44%0.97%0.78%0.25%
EEV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets
7.27%5.40%4.45%3.45%0.27%0.00%0.14%1.34%0.38%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEV and EDC have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDC has higher volatility (26.81%) compared to EEV (19.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEV dropped -99.88% vs EDC's -92.54%.

On 10-year performance, EDC leads with 2.93% vs -21.72% for EEV. On fees, EEV is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, EEV has been the lower-risk option at 19.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EDC has performed better with a 2.93% return vs -21.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEV is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.

EEV has the higher dividend yield at 7.27%, compared with 1.50% for EDC.

EEV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-200%), while EDC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EEV and 1.33% for EDC.

EDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEV and EDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer