EEMS vs. UEVM
EEMS (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF) and UEVM (VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEMS is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index, while UEVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEMS returned 7.03%/yr vs 7.52%/yr for UEVM. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EEMS charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for UEVM.
Performance
EEMS vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMS achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly higher than UEVM's 8.82% return.
EEMS
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 15.19%
- 6M
- 17.20%
- 1Y
- 28.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.25%
UEVM
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 8.82%
- 6M
- 7.88%
- 1Y
- 23.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.12%
- 5Y*
- 7.52%
- 10Y*
- —
EEMS vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMS iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF | 15.19% | 19.78% | 3.13% | 23.09% | -19.12% | 18.12% | 19.47% | 11.25% | -18.98% | 6.33% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 8.82% | 22.74% | 11.92% | 17.41% | -14.60% | 11.09% | 3.77% | 10.71% | -16.96% | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMS and UEVM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between EEMS and UEVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
EEMS vs. UEVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEMS
UEVM
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Technology
EEMS
UEVM
Industrials
EEMS
UEVM
Financial Services
EEMS
UEVM
Consumer Cyclical
EEMS
UEVM
Healthcare
EEMS
UEVM
Basic Materials
EEMS
UEVM
Real Estate
EEMS
UEVM
Consumer Defensive
EEMS
UEVM
Communication Services
EEMS
UEVM
Utilities
EEMS
UEVM
Energy
EEMS
UEVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMS vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank
EEMS
UEVM
EEMS vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EEMS | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 2.45 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.39 | 8.28 | +1.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEMS | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 1.58 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.47 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.33 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
EEMS vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMS drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, which is greater than UEVM's maximum drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMS and UEVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMS | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.89% | -45.44% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -9.79% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.71% | -18.88% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.07% | -26.98% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -2.33% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.50% | -11.67% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 2.89% | +0.19% |
Volatility
EEMS vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) has a higher volatility of 6.80% compared to VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) at 5.03%. This indicates that EEMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMS | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.80% | 5.03% | +1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.90% | 12.13% | +2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.30% | 15.17% | +2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 15.90% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 18.38% | -0.39% |
EEMS vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMS has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEMS vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison
EEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than UEVM's 3.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMS iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF | 2.68% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.69% | 0.89% | 3.56% | 2.14% | 2.64% | 3.06% | 2.47% | 2.51% | 2.33% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 3.06% | 4.02% | 5.65% | 4.71% | 3.46% | 4.49% | 2.19% | 2.79% | 2.34% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMS and UEVM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMS has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to UEVM (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMS dropped -48.89% vs UEVM's -45.44%.
On 5-year performance, UEVM leads with 7.52% vs 7.03% for EEMS. On fees, UEVM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UEVM has performed better with a 7.52% return vs 7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UEVM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for EEMS.
UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 2.68% for EEMS.
EEMS is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while UEVM is Momentum. EEMS tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index, while UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for EEMS and 0.45% for UEVM.
EEMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMS and UEVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer