PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMS vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMS vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMS achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMS has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 9.29%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.


EEMS

1D
-1.36%
1M
1.46%
YTD
14.63%
6M
16.52%
1Y
29.38%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
9.29%

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMS vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
14.63%19.78%3.13%23.09%-19.12%18.12%19.47%11.25%-18.98%34.80%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMS and SPY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2011

0.64

The correlation between EEMS and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEMS vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEMS
SPY

Technology

22.7%
35.9%

Industrials

18.9%
7.8%

Financial Services

11.1%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
10.3%

Healthcare

9.4%
8.4%

Basic Materials

9.3%
1.8%

Real Estate

5.9%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
4.8%

Communication Services

2.9%
11.3%

Utilities

2.7%
2.4%

Energy

2.4%
3.6%

Technology

EEMS
22.7%
SPY
35.9%

Industrials

EEMS
18.9%
SPY
7.8%

Financial Services

EEMS
11.1%
SPY
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EEMS
9.6%
SPY
10.3%

Healthcare

EEMS
9.4%
SPY
8.4%

Basic Materials

EEMS
9.3%
SPY
1.8%

Real Estate

EEMS
5.9%
SPY
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

EEMS
5.2%
SPY
4.8%

Communication Services

EEMS
2.9%
SPY
11.3%

Utilities

EEMS
2.7%
SPY
2.4%

Energy

EEMS
2.4%
SPY
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMS vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMS
EEMS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMS vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEMSSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.43

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

3.16

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.56

14.72

-5.16

EEMS vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMS and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEMSSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

2.38

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.82

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.87

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.59

-0.27

Drawdowns

EEMS vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMS drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMS and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMSSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.89%

-55.19%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-8.88%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.71%

-18.76%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-24.50%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.89%

-33.72%

-15.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-0.70%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.50%

-9.05%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

1.91%

+1.17%

Volatility

EEMS vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that EEMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMSSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.07%

2.84%

+4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.90%

8.90%

+6.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.30%

11.83%

+5.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

17.05%

-0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.99%

17.94%

+0.05%

EEMS vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMS has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMS vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

EEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
2.69%3.09%2.60%2.69%0.89%3.56%2.14%2.64%3.06%2.47%2.51%2.33%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMS and SPY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMS has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMS dropped -48.89% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.49% vs 9.29% for EEMS. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for EEMS.

EEMS has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.

EEMS is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while SPY is S&P 500. EEMS tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for EEMS and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMS and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer