PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMS vs. DIEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMS vs. DIEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMS achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly lower than DIEM's 32.78% return.


EEMS

1D
-1.36%
1M
1.46%
YTD
14.63%
6M
16.52%
1Y
29.38%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
9.29%

DIEM

1D
-1.37%
1M
12.08%
YTD
32.78%
6M
35.57%
1Y
60.54%
3Y*
28.35%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMS vs. DIEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
14.63%19.78%3.13%23.09%-19.12%18.12%19.47%11.25%-18.98%34.80%
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
32.78%30.81%12.29%15.41%-20.61%6.92%1.27%12.23%-11.29%27.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMS and DIEM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2016

0.85

The correlation between EEMS and DIEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEMS vs. DIEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEMS
DIEM

Technology

22.7%
40.3%

Industrials

18.9%
4.7%

Financial Services

11.1%
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
6.7%

Healthcare

9.4%
0.6%

Basic Materials

9.3%
4.2%

Real Estate

5.9%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
2.9%

Communication Services

2.9%
5.6%

Utilities

2.7%
4.1%

Energy

2.4%
6.0%

Technology

EEMS
22.7%
DIEM
40.3%

Industrials

EEMS
18.9%
DIEM
4.7%

Financial Services

EEMS
11.1%
DIEM
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EEMS
9.6%
DIEM
6.7%

Healthcare

EEMS
9.4%
DIEM
0.6%

Basic Materials

EEMS
9.3%
DIEM
4.2%

Real Estate

EEMS
5.9%
DIEM
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

EEMS
5.2%
DIEM
2.9%

Communication Services

EEMS
2.9%
DIEM
5.6%

Utilities

EEMS
2.7%
DIEM
4.1%

Energy

EEMS
2.4%
DIEM
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMS vs. DIEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMS
EEMS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

DIEM
DIEM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DIEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DIEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMS vs. DIEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEMSDIEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.62

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

4.93

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.56

20.34

-10.78

EEMS vs. DIEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the DIEM Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMS and DIEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEMSDIEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

3.35

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.68

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.55

-0.23

Drawdowns

EEMS vs. DIEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMS drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, which is greater than DIEM's maximum drawdown of -38.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMS and DIEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMSDIEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.89%

-38.61%

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-12.33%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.71%

-16.82%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-33.34%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.89%

-38.61%

-10.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-1.37%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.50%

-9.72%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

2.99%

+0.09%

Volatility

EEMS vs. DIEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) is 7.07%, while Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) has a volatility of 8.52%. This indicates that EEMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMSDIEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.07%

8.52%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.90%

15.91%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.30%

18.17%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

16.93%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.99%

17.59%

+0.40%

EEMS vs. DIEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMS has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than DIEM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMS vs. DIEM - Dividend Comparison

EEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than DIEM's 2.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
2.30%2.99%4.92%4.45%6.31%4.06%2.75%5.98%3.87%2.61%0.35%0.00%
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
2.69%3.09%2.60%2.69%0.89%3.56%2.14%2.64%3.06%2.47%2.51%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMS and DIEM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIEM has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to EEMS (7.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMS dropped -48.89% vs DIEM's -38.61%.

On 5-year performance, DIEM leads with 11.49% vs 6.92% for EEMS. On fees, DIEM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EEMS has been the lower-risk option at 7.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIEM has performed better with a 11.49% return vs 6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIEM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for EEMS.

EEMS has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.30% for DIEM.

EEMS tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index, while DIEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for EEMS and 0.19% for DIEM.

DIEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMS and DIEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer