EEMS vs. DFEV
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV).
EEMS and DFEV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EEMS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index. It was launched on Aug 16, 2011. DFEV is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Apr 26, 2022.
Performance
EEMS vs. DFEV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EEMS vs. DFEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMS iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF | 2.58% | 19.78% | 3.13% | 23.09% | -10.07% |
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | 6.02% | 32.54% | 7.26% | 15.52% | -6.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMS achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than DFEV's 6.02% return.
EEMS
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 4.20%
- 1Y
- 25.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 6.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
DFEV
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- 6.02%
- 6M
- 12.20%
- 1Y
- 35.19%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EEMS vs. DFEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMS has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than DFEV's 0.43% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EEMS vs. DFEV — Risk / Return Rank
EEMS
DFEV
EEMS vs. DFEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EEMS | DFEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 2.00 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 2.58 | -0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.39 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 2.71 | -0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | 10.83 | -2.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEMS | DFEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 2.00 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.83 | -0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMS and DFEV is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EEMS vs. DFEV - Dividend Comparison
EEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than DFEV's 2.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMS iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF | 3.01% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.69% | 0.89% | 3.56% | 2.14% | 2.64% | 3.06% | 2.47% | 2.51% | 2.33% |
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | 2.47% | 2.69% | 3.17% | 3.47% | 3.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EEMS vs. DFEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMS drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, which is greater than DFEV's maximum drawdown of -18.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMS and DFEV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMS | DFEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.89% | -18.49% | -30.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -11.55% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.57% | -8.91% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.60% | -4.78% | -5.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 3.25% | -0.15% |
Volatility
EEMS vs. DFEV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) have volatilities of 8.26% and 7.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EEMS | DFEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.26% | 7.95% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 12.83% | -0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.70% | 17.71% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 15.98% | -0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 15.98% | +1.81% |