PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFEV vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFEV vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFEV achieves a 29.46% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.42% return.


DFEV

1D
-1.36%
1M
9.10%
YTD
29.46%
6M
32.40%
1Y
57.15%
3Y*
25.84%
5Y*
10Y*

SCHG

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.81%
YTD
6.42%
6M
5.81%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
15.59%
10Y*
18.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFEV vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFEV
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF
29.46%32.54%7.26%15.52%-6.71%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.42%17.50%34.95%50.10%-14.93%

Correlation

The correlation between DFEV and SCHG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022

0.58

The correlation between DFEV and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (3 years) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DFEV vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFEV
SCHG

Technology

28.6%
46.3%

Financial Services

16.8%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
12.7%

Industrials

9.8%
5.8%

Energy

7.6%
0.8%

Basic Materials

7.4%
1.4%

Communication Services

3.5%
16.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
1.7%

Healthcare

3.3%
7.7%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.5%

Utilities

0.8%
0.4%

Technology

DFEV
28.6%
SCHG
46.3%

Financial Services

DFEV
16.8%
SCHG
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DFEV
10.5%
SCHG
12.7%

Industrials

DFEV
9.8%
SCHG
5.8%

Energy

DFEV
7.6%
SCHG
0.8%

Basic Materials

DFEV
7.4%
SCHG
1.4%

Communication Services

DFEV
3.5%
SCHG
16.0%

Consumer Defensive

DFEV
3.4%
SCHG
1.7%

Healthcare

DFEV
3.3%
SCHG
7.7%

Real Estate

DFEV
1.6%
SCHG
0.5%

Utilities

DFEV
0.8%
SCHG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFEV vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFEV
DFEV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DFEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFEV vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFEVSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.28

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

1.51

+3.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.06

5.04

+14.02

DFEV vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFEV Sharpe Ratio is 3.32, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFEV and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFEVSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.32

1.60

+1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.84

+0.27

Drawdowns

DFEV vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFEV drawdown since its inception was -18.49%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEV and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFEVSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.49%

-34.59%

+16.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.35%

-16.41%

+5.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.94%

-23.39%

+5.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-1.78%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-5.20%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

4.90%

-1.89%

Volatility

DFEV vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) has a higher volatility of 7.73% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.61%. This indicates that DFEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFEVSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.73%

3.61%

+4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.85%

11.62%

+3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.31%

15.50%

+1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.42%

22.27%

-5.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.42%

21.55%

-5.13%

DFEV vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFEV has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFEV vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

DFEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFEV
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF
2.02%2.69%3.17%3.47%3.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFEV and SCHG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFEV has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEV dropped -18.49% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 3-year performance, DFEV leads with 25.84% vs 25.02% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFEV has performed better with a 25.84% return vs 25.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for DFEV.

DFEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.

DFEV is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for DFEV and 0.04% for SCHG.

DFEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFEV and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer