EEMO vs. XMVM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EEMO (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) and XMVM (Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - EEMO tracks the S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index while XMVM tracks the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEMO returned 6.35%/yr vs 12.44%/yr for XMVM. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EEMO charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XMVM.

Performance

EEMO vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMO achieves a 13.88% return, which is significantly lower than XMVM's 17.44% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMO has underperformed XMVM with an annualized return of 6.35%, while XMVM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.

EEMO

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -11.19%
• 6M: 8.68%
• YTD: 13.88%
• 1Y: 20.52%
• 3Y*: 13.43%
• 5Y*: 4.39%
• 10Y*: 6.35%
• ALL TIME*: 1.62%

XMVM

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 5.11%
• 6M: 13.72%
• YTD: 17.44%
• 1Y: 38.27%
• 3Y*: 17.47%
• 5Y*: 12.42%
• 10Y*: 12.44%
• ALL TIME*: 9.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	$285.36K	$494.03K	$516.10K
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	$2.16M	$2.04M	$1.98M

EEMO vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	13.88%	10.99%	9.88%	13.90%	-18.73%	-5.57%	9.66%	21.17%	-17.24%	49.65%
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	17.44%	18.46%	11.73%	16.31%	-8.21%	35.15%	5.68%	30.38%	-9.62%	2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMO and XMVM is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012	0.39

The correlation between EEMO and XMVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EEMO vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EEMO	XMVM
Technology	56.8%	5.1%
Financial Services	15.0%	37.9%
Basic Materials	9.6%	0.8%
Industrials	8.2%	11.7%
Consumer Cyclical	2.6%	14.8%
Healthcare	2.2%	2.5%
Energy	1.7%	13.5%
Utilities	1.4%	8.5%
Communication Services	1.3%	0.9%
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	1.2%
Real Estate	0.3%	4.9%

Return for Risk

EEMO vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EEMO

EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 27
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 30
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 32

XMVM

XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 91
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 91
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EEMO vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EEMO	XMVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	2.42	-1.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	3.49	-2.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.43	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.72	3.91	-3.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.94	12.52	-9.58

EEMO vs. XMVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the XMVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMO and XMVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EEMO vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMO drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, smaller than the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMO and XMVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEMO	XMVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.47%	-62.83%	+14.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.41%	-9.18%	-18.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.41%	-24.12%	-3.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.59%	-24.12%	-5.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.57%	-45.07%	-1.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.95%	-0.71%	-22.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.08%	-10.20%	-9.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.74%	2.86%	+3.88%

Volatility

EEMO vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a higher volatility of 16.65% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.29%. This indicates that EEMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEMO	XMVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.65%	3.29%	+13.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.96%	9.25%	+24.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.14%	14.85%	+20.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.09%	21.24%	+0.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.02%	22.74%	+0.28%

EEMO vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEMO vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison

EEMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than XMVM's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	1.99%	2.31%	2.57%	3.65%	3.82%	1.51%	1.53%	2.13%	13.10%	5.13%	1.55%	2.92%
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	1.79%	2.07%	1.43%	1.57%	1.76%	1.10%	1.37%	1.73%	2.87%	2.22%	2.27%	2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEMO and XMVM in my portfolio?

EEMO and XMVM have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EEMO or XMVM?

EEMO has higher volatility (16.65%) compared to XMVM (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMO dropped -48.47% vs XMVM's -62.83%.

Which ETF is better, EEMO or XMVM?

On 10-year performance, XMVM leads with 12.44% vs 6.35% for EEMO. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EEMO or XMVM?

Over the 10-year period, XMVM has performed better with a 12.44% return vs 6.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EEMO or XMVM?

EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XMVM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EEMO or XMVM?

EEMO has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.79% for XMVM.

What is the main difference between EEMO and XMVM?

EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EEMO and 0.39% for XMVM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.