PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMO vs. VFMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMO vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMO achieves a 22.87% return, which is significantly higher than VFMO's 18.99% return.


EEMO

1D
-10.22%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
22.87%
6M
22.22%
1Y
34.86%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
7.33%

VFMO

1D
-4.59%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
18.99%
6M
17.18%
1Y
38.31%
3Y*
25.96%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMO vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
22.87%10.99%9.88%13.90%-18.73%-5.57%9.66%21.17%-20.83%
VFMO
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
18.99%17.39%26.14%16.25%-12.84%19.16%31.36%28.22%-11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMO and VFMO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.60

The correlation between EEMO and VFMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEMO vs. VFMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEMO
VFMO

Technology

43.8%
17.5%

Financial Services

18.0%
6.5%

Basic Materials

12.9%
6.4%

Industrials

11.5%
24.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.2%
8.7%

Healthcare

3.0%
22.9%

Energy

2.5%
7.3%

Utilities

2.0%
0.2%

Communication Services

1.5%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
2.5%

Real Estate

0.5%
0.1%

Technology

EEMO
43.8%
VFMO
17.5%

Financial Services

EEMO
18.0%
VFMO
6.5%

Basic Materials

EEMO
12.9%
VFMO
6.4%

Industrials

EEMO
11.5%
VFMO
24.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EEMO
3.2%
VFMO
8.7%

Healthcare

EEMO
3.0%
VFMO
22.9%

Energy

EEMO
2.5%
VFMO
7.3%

Utilities

EEMO
2.0%
VFMO
0.2%

Communication Services

EEMO
1.5%
VFMO
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

EEMO
1.2%
VFMO
2.5%

Real Estate

EEMO
0.5%
VFMO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMO vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMO
EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

VFMO
VFMO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VFMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMO vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEMOVFMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.31

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

3.50

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.25

13.17

-3.92

EEMO vs. VFMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the VFMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMO and VFMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEMOVFMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.77

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.60

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.63

-0.54

Drawdowns

EEMO vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMO drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than VFMO's maximum drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMO and VFMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMOVFMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.47%

-36.77%

-11.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

-10.98%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.06%

-24.40%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.03%

-25.80%

-8.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.55%

-4.59%

-8.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.16%

-7.76%

-12.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

2.92%

+0.86%

Volatility

EEMO vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a higher volatility of 17.45% compared to Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) at 7.54%. This indicates that EEMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMOVFMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.45%

7.54%

+9.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.85%

17.05%

+7.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.65%

21.73%

+4.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.89%

21.79%

-1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.84%

23.61%

-1.77%

EEMO vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMO vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison

EEMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than VFMO's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.87%2.31%2.57%3.65%3.82%1.51%1.53%2.13%13.10%5.13%1.55%2.92%
VFMO
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.65%0.82%0.72%0.89%1.72%0.81%0.45%1.22%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMO and VFMO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMO has higher volatility (17.45%) compared to VFMO (7.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMO dropped -48.47% vs VFMO's -36.77%.

On 5-year performance, VFMO leads with 12.96% vs 4.39% for EEMO. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 12.96% return vs 4.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EEMO.

EEMO has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.65% for VFMO.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EEMO and 0.13% for VFMO.

VFMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMO and VFMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer