EEMO vs. PXI
EEMO (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) and PXI (Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - EEMO tracks the S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index while PXI tracks the Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEMO returned 6.93%/yr vs 5.98%/yr for PXI. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EEMO charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PXI.
Performance
EEMO vs. PXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMO achieves a 21.17% return, which is significantly lower than PXI's 29.02% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMO has outperformed PXI with an annualized return of 6.93%, while PXI has yielded a comparatively lower 5.98% annualized return.
EEMO
- 1D
- -6.80%
- 1M
- -9.88%
- 6M
- 14.98%
- YTD
- 21.17%
- 1Y
- 28.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- 6.93%
PXI
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 24.43%
- YTD
- 29.02%
- 1Y
- 33.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 18.42%
- 10Y*
- 5.98%
EEMO vs. PXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 21.17% | 10.99% | 9.88% | 13.90% | -18.73% | -5.57% | 9.66% | 21.17% | -17.24% | 49.65% |
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 29.02% | 3.86% | 0.76% | 5.48% | 45.85% | 75.05% | -35.91% | 1.67% | -27.56% | -8.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMO and PXI is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012 | 0.32 |
The correlation between EEMO and PXI shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.35 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EEMO vs. PXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEMO
PXI
Technology
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
EEMO
PXI
-
Financial Services
EEMO
PXI
Basic Materials
EEMO
PXI
Industrials
EEMO
PXI
Consumer Cyclical
EEMO
PXI
-
Healthcare
EEMO
PXI
-
Energy
EEMO
PXI
Utilities
EEMO
PXI
-
Communication Services
EEMO
PXI
-
Consumer Defensive
EEMO
PXI
-
Real Estate
EEMO
PXI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMO vs. PXI — Risk / Return Rank
EEMO
PXI
EEMO vs. PXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEMO | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.25 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 2.68 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.95 | 7.29 | -1.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEMO vs. PXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMO drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, smaller than the maximum PXI drawdown of -85.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMO and PXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMO | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.47% | -85.08% | +36.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.02% | -12.40% | -5.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.06% | -30.74% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.72% | -33.47% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.57% | -79.55% | +32.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.02% | -6.01% | -12.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.08% | -29.32% | +9.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | 4.56% | +0.20% |
Volatility
EEMO vs. PXI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a higher volatility of 19.79% compared to Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) at 7.31%. This indicates that EEMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMO | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.79% | 7.31% | +12.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.62% | 17.49% | +14.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.90% | 22.36% | +10.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.63% | 33.25% | -11.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 36.99% | -14.29% |
EEMO vs. PXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than PXI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEMO vs. PXI - Dividend Comparison
EEMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than PXI's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.87% | 2.31% | 2.57% | 3.65% | 3.82% | 1.51% | 1.53% | 2.13% | 13.10% | 5.13% | 1.55% | 2.92% |
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 1.27% | 1.81% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 3.14% | 0.57% | 1.72% | 2.80% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMO and PXI have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMO has higher volatility (19.79%) compared to PXI (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMO dropped -48.47% vs PXI's -85.08%.
On 10-year performance, EEMO leads with 6.93% vs 5.98% for PXI. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, PXI has been the lower-risk option at 7.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EEMO has performed better with a 6.93% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PXI.
EEMO has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.27% for PXI.
EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index, while PXI tracks Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EEMO and 0.60% for PXI.
PXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMO and PXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer