PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMO vs. IMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMO vs. IMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMO achieves a 41.14% return, which is significantly higher than IMTM's 11.83% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMO has underperformed IMTM with an annualized return of 9.15%, while IMTM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.25% annualized return.


EEMO

1D
3.82%
1M
3.90%
YTD
41.14%
6M
40.15%
1Y
49.68%
3Y*
24.60%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
9.15%

IMTM

1D
1.51%
1M
0.40%
YTD
11.83%
6M
10.95%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
21.72%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMO vs. IMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
41.14%10.99%9.88%13.90%-18.73%-5.57%9.66%21.17%-17.24%49.65%
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
11.83%34.50%12.17%13.89%-16.81%3.50%22.17%24.52%-14.31%25.46%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMO and IMTM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2015

0.59

The correlation between EEMO and IMTM shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EEMO vs. IMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEMO
IMTM

Technology

53.0%
15.6%

Financial Services

15.4%
28.6%

Basic Materials

9.9%
9.7%

Industrials

7.5%
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

2.8%
1.8%

Healthcare

2.3%
8.9%

Communication Services

1.2%
1.5%

Utilities

1.0%
5.3%

Energy

0.8%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.6%
2.1%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.1%

Technology

EEMO
53.0%
IMTM
15.6%

Financial Services

EEMO
15.4%
IMTM
28.6%

Basic Materials

EEMO
9.9%
IMTM
9.7%

Industrials

EEMO
7.5%
IMTM
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EEMO
2.8%
IMTM
1.8%

Healthcare

EEMO
2.3%
IMTM
8.9%

Communication Services

EEMO
1.2%
IMTM
1.5%

Utilities

EEMO
1.0%
IMTM
5.3%

Energy

EEMO
0.8%
IMTM
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

EEMO
0.6%
IMTM
2.1%

Real Estate

EEMO
0.3%
IMTM
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMO vs. IMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMO
EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IMTM
IMTM Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMO vs. IMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEMOIMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.25

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

1.90

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

7.48

+4.73

EEMO vs. IMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the IMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMO and IMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEMO vs. IMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMO drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than IMTM's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMO and IMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMOIMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.47%

-32.66%

-15.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

-12.85%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.06%

-12.85%

-13.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.03%

-32.66%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.57%

-32.66%

-13.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.50%

-2.41%

-2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.11%

-7.41%

-12.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

3.25%

+0.83%

Volatility

EEMO vs. IMTM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a higher volatility of 19.67% compared to iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) at 7.49%. This indicates that EEMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMOIMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.67%

7.49%

+12.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.97%

16.41%

+12.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.38%

18.23%

+12.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.99%

17.86%

+3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

17.62%

+4.74%

EEMO vs. IMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than IMTM's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMO vs. IMTM - Dividend Comparison

EEMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than IMTM's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.61%2.31%2.57%3.65%3.82%1.51%1.53%2.13%13.10%5.13%1.55%2.92%
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
4.38%4.70%2.93%2.29%2.68%2.51%0.97%2.13%2.36%1.92%2.75%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMO and IMTM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMO has higher volatility (19.67%) compared to IMTM (7.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMO dropped -48.47% vs IMTM's -32.66%.

On 10-year performance, IMTM leads with 10.25% vs 9.15% for EEMO. On fees, IMTM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, IMTM has been the lower-risk option at 7.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IMTM has performed better with a 10.25% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMTM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EEMO.

IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 1.61% for EEMO.

EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index, while IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EEMO and 0.30% for IMTM.

EEMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMO and IMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer