PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEM vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEM vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEM achieves a 27.80% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 14.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EEM having a 9.93% annualized return and VEA not far ahead at 10.17%.


EEM

1D
-1.24%
1M
9.08%
YTD
27.80%
6M
30.51%
1Y
55.80%
3Y*
23.95%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
9.93%

VEA

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.54%
YTD
14.92%
6M
18.15%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEM vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
27.80%33.98%6.49%8.95%-20.56%-3.63%17.02%18.22%-15.31%37.26%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.92%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EEM and VEA is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.82

The correlation between EEM and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEM vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEM
VEA

Technology

43.6%
13.8%

Financial Services

17.5%
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
7.5%

Industrials

6.2%
19.2%

Basic Materials

6.1%
7.5%

Communication Services

5.7%
3.4%

Energy

3.3%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
5.6%

Healthcare

2.5%
8.2%

Utilities

2.0%
3.3%

Real Estate

0.9%
2.7%

Technology

EEM
43.6%
VEA
13.8%

Financial Services

EEM
17.5%
VEA
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EEM
8.1%
VEA
7.5%

Industrials

EEM
6.2%
VEA
19.2%

Basic Materials

EEM
6.1%
VEA
7.5%

Communication Services

EEM
5.7%
VEA
3.4%

Energy

EEM
3.3%
VEA
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

EEM
2.7%
VEA
5.6%

Healthcare

EEM
2.5%
VEA
8.2%

Utilities

EEM
2.0%
VEA
3.3%

Real Estate

EEM
0.9%
VEA
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEM vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEM
EEM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEM vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEMVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.38

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.15

2.81

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.99

10.94

+5.04

EEM vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEM and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEMVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

2.09

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.58

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.59

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.25

+0.14

Drawdowns

EEM vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEM drawdown since its inception was -66.43%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEM and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.43%

-60.68%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.52%

-11.63%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

-13.45%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.71%

-29.71%

-8.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.82%

-35.73%

-4.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-0.90%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.02%

-13.29%

-2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

2.98%

+0.52%

Volatility

EEM vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 5.66%. This indicates that EEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.52%

5.66%

+2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.42%

13.32%

+4.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.97%

15.66%

+4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.91%

16.55%

+2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.50%

17.36%

+3.14%

EEM vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEM vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
1.74%2.22%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEM and VEA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEM has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to VEA (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEM dropped -66.43% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.17% vs 9.93% for EEM. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.17% return vs 9.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.74% for EEM.

EEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net), while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for EEM and 0.03% for VEA.

EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEM and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer