PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEM vs. PIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEM vs. PIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEM achieves a 20.75% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 36.54% return. Over the past 10 years, EEM has underperformed PIE with an annualized return of 8.37%, while PIE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.34% annualized return.


EEM

1D
-0.42%
1M
-2.74%
6M
12.35%
YTD
20.75%
1Y
37.20%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
8.37%
ALL TIME*
9.98%

PIE

1D
0.90%
1M
-3.72%
6M
24.43%
YTD
36.54%
1Y
49.64%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
9.34%
ALL TIME*
2.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.66B$1.55B$1.89B
$2.19M$4.18M$2.90M

EEM vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
20.75%33.98%6.49%8.95%-20.56%-3.63%17.02%18.22%-15.31%37.26%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
36.54%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%41.80%

Correlation

The correlation between EEM and PIE is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007

0.85

The correlation between EEM and PIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEM vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEM
PIE

Technology

45.9%
52.7%

Financial Services

18.2%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
1.5%

Industrials

6.2%
15.3%

Communication Services

6.0%
1.3%

Basic Materials

5.4%
2.9%

Energy

3.2%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
0.2%

Healthcare

2.5%
3.2%

Utilities

1.8%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.0%
3.5%

Technology

EEM
45.9%
PIE
52.7%

Financial Services

EEM
18.2%
PIE
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EEM
7.4%
PIE
1.5%

Industrials

EEM
6.2%
PIE
15.3%

Communication Services

EEM
6.0%
PIE
1.3%

Basic Materials

EEM
5.4%
PIE
2.9%

Energy

EEM
3.2%
PIE
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

EEM
2.5%
PIE
0.2%

Healthcare

EEM
2.5%
PIE
3.2%

Utilities

EEM
1.8%
PIE
1.2%

Real Estate

EEM
1.0%
PIE
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEM vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EEM
EEM Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EEM vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEMPIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.89

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.91

11.36

-3.45

EEM vs. PIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the PIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEM and PIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEM vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEM drawdown since its inception was -66.43%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEM and PIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMPIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.43%

-72.98%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.24%

-17.26%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

-28.69%

+11.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.01%

-36.78%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.82%

-40.32%

+0.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.71%

-6.59%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.95%

-25.90%

+9.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.71%

4.38%

+0.33%

Volatility

EEM vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) is 8.53%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 12.04%. This indicates that EEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMPIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.53%

12.04%

-3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.42%

24.33%

-1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.55%

27.47%

-2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.87%

21.44%

-1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.81%

21.91%

-1.10%

EEM vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEM vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison

EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than PIE's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
1.70%2.22%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.77%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEM and PIE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to EEM (8.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEM dropped -66.43% vs PIE's -72.98%.

On 10-year performance, PIE leads with 9.34% vs 8.37% for EEM. On fees, EEM is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, EEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PIE has performed better with a 9.34% return vs 8.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEM is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

PIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.70% for EEM.

EEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PIE is Momentum. EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net), while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for EEM and 0.90% for PIE.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEM and PIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer