PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EELV vs. ONEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EELV vs. ONEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) and SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EELV achieves a 4.49% return, which is significantly lower than ONEV's 6.90% return. Over the past 10 years, EELV has underperformed ONEV with an annualized return of 6.55%, while ONEV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.20% annualized return.


EELV

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
4.49%
6M
5.24%
1Y
14.63%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
6.55%

ONEV

1D
0.55%
1M
2.13%
YTD
6.90%
6M
7.03%
1Y
13.15%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
11.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EELV vs. ONEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EELV
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF
4.49%21.97%1.90%8.85%-3.98%16.15%-3.89%8.89%-5.40%24.89%
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
6.90%8.14%11.76%13.28%-8.15%29.19%6.66%30.66%-5.30%18.11%

Correlation

The correlation between EELV and ONEV is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2015

0.50

The correlation between EELV and ONEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

EELV vs. ONEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EELV
ONEV

Financial Services

37.4%
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
8.5%

Communication Services

9.6%
2.6%

Utilities

9.6%
8.9%

Industrials

8.9%
19.5%

Energy

6.5%
1.6%

Healthcare

5.4%
13.9%

Basic Materials

5.3%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
12.7%

Real Estate

2.6%
5.2%

Technology

0.2%
11.0%

Financial Services

EELV
37.4%
ONEV
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

EELV
10.8%
ONEV
8.5%

Communication Services

EELV
9.6%
ONEV
2.6%

Utilities

EELV
9.6%
ONEV
8.9%

Industrials

EELV
8.9%
ONEV
19.5%

Energy

EELV
6.5%
ONEV
1.6%

Healthcare

EELV
5.4%
ONEV
13.9%

Basic Materials

EELV
5.3%
ONEV
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EELV
3.8%
ONEV
12.7%

Real Estate

EELV
2.6%
ONEV
5.2%

Technology

EELV
0.2%
ONEV
11.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EELV vs. ONEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EELV
EELV Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
EELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EELV Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
EELV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEV
ONEV Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ONEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEV Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EELV vs. ONEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) and SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EELVONEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.21

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

1.70

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.02

5.82

+0.20

EELV vs. ONEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EELV Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the ONEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EELV and ONEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EELVONEVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.18

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.55

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.66

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.67

-0.37

Drawdowns

EELV vs. ONEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EELV drawdown since its inception was -36.35%, smaller than the maximum ONEV drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EELV and ONEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EELVONEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.35%

-39.72%

+3.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.22%

-7.75%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.79%

-14.81%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-18.52%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.35%

-39.72%

+3.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-0.44%

-3.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-3.90%

-5.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.27%

+0.17%

Volatility

EELV vs. ONEV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) at 2.58%. This indicates that EELV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EELVONEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

2.58%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

7.73%

+1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.88%

11.19%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.36%

14.54%

-3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.64%

17.02%

-3.38%

EELV vs. ONEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EELV has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEV's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

EELV vs. ONEV - Dividend Comparison

EELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than ONEV's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EELV
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF
3.58%3.75%4.70%4.00%3.45%4.35%2.82%3.14%5.50%2.92%2.29%2.53%
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
1.75%1.81%1.88%1.79%1.80%1.44%1.87%2.07%2.14%6.91%3.73%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


EELV and ONEV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EELV has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to ONEV (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EELV dropped -36.35% vs ONEV's -39.72%.

On 10-year performance, ONEV leads with 11.20% vs 6.55% for EELV. On fees, ONEV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ONEV has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEV has performed better with a 11.20% return vs 6.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EELV.

EELV has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 1.75% for ONEV.

EELV tracks S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index, while ONEV tracks Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EELV and 0.20% for ONEV.

EELV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EELV and ONEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer