PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EELV vs. IDLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EELV vs. IDLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) and Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EELV achieves a 4.49% return, which is significantly higher than IDLV's 2.63% return. Over the past 10 years, EELV has outperformed IDLV with an annualized return of 6.55%, while IDLV has yielded a comparatively lower 5.05% annualized return.


EELV

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
4.49%
6M
5.24%
1Y
14.63%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
6.55%

IDLV

1D
0.27%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
2.63%
6M
4.87%
1Y
9.37%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
5.93%
10Y*
5.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EELV vs. IDLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EELV
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF
4.49%21.97%1.90%8.85%-3.98%16.15%-3.89%8.89%-5.40%24.89%
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
2.63%27.77%2.15%9.18%-12.21%9.76%-9.78%20.09%-8.02%22.01%

Correlation

The correlation between EELV and IDLV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2012

0.71

The correlation between EELV and IDLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

EELV vs. IDLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EELV
IDLV

Financial Services

37.4%
22.9%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
13.8%

Communication Services

9.6%
8.6%

Utilities

9.6%
11.4%

Industrials

8.9%
16.4%

Energy

6.5%
3.6%

Healthcare

5.4%
1.7%

Basic Materials

5.3%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
3.8%

Real Estate

2.6%
15.4%

Technology

0.2%
0.7%

Financial Services

EELV
37.4%
IDLV
22.9%

Consumer Defensive

EELV
10.8%
IDLV
13.8%

Communication Services

EELV
9.6%
IDLV
8.6%

Utilities

EELV
9.6%
IDLV
11.4%

Industrials

EELV
8.9%
IDLV
16.4%

Energy

EELV
6.5%
IDLV
3.6%

Healthcare

EELV
5.4%
IDLV
1.7%

Basic Materials

EELV
5.3%
IDLV
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EELV
3.8%
IDLV
3.8%

Real Estate

EELV
2.6%
IDLV
15.4%

Technology

EELV
0.2%
IDLV
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EELV vs. IDLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EELV
EELV Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
EELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EELV Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
EELV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

IDLV
IDLV Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EELV vs. IDLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) and Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EELVIDLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.18

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

1.25

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.02

3.66

+2.36

EELV vs. IDLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EELV Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the IDLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EELV and IDLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EELVIDLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

0.96

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.51

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.38

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.45

-0.14

Drawdowns

EELV vs. IDLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EELV drawdown since its inception was -36.35%, roughly equal to the maximum IDLV drawdown of -34.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EELV and IDLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EELVIDLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.35%

-34.65%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.22%

-7.54%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.79%

-9.97%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-22.52%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.35%

-34.65%

-1.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-5.69%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-5.95%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.57%

-0.13%

Volatility

EELV vs. IDLV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) at 2.51%. This indicates that EELV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EELVIDLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

2.51%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

7.65%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.88%

9.76%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.36%

11.79%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.64%

13.39%

+0.25%

EELV vs. IDLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EELV has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IDLV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EELV vs. IDLV - Dividend Comparison

EELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than IDLV's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EELV
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF
3.58%3.75%4.70%4.00%3.45%4.35%2.82%3.14%5.50%2.92%2.29%2.53%
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
4.69%4.63%3.41%3.59%4.69%2.99%2.30%4.92%3.94%3.05%3.92%3.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


EELV and IDLV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EELV has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to IDLV (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EELV dropped -36.35% vs IDLV's -34.65%.

On 10-year performance, EELV leads with 6.55% vs 5.05% for IDLV. On fees, IDLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IDLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EELV has performed better with a 6.55% return vs 5.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EELV.

IDLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 3.58% for EELV.

EELV tracks S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index, while IDLV tracks S&P BMI International Developed Low Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EELV and 0.25% for IDLV.

EELV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EELV and IDLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer