EEFT vs. VOO

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EEFT having a -5.88% return and VOO slightly higher at -5.74%. Over the past 10 years, EEFT has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 5.17%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.07% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EEFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEFT and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EEFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.

The maximum EEFT drawdown since its inception was -87.92%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEFT and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) has a higher volatility of 18.64% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 13.96%. This indicates that EEFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.