PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEFT vs. ADBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EEFT vs. ADBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) and Adobe Inc (ADBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEFT achieves a -6.28% return, which is significantly higher than ADBE's -28.45% return. Over the past 10 years, EEFT has underperformed ADBE with an annualized return of -0.56%, while ADBE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.06% annualized return.


EEFT

1D
-6.96%
1M
-7.58%
6M
-1.56%
YTD
-6.28%
1Y
-24.04%
3Y*
-6.63%
5Y*
-12.96%
10Y*
-0.56%
ALL TIME*
5.48%

ADBE

1D
1.01%
1M
13.97%
6M
-14.61%
YTD
-28.45%
1Y
-28.00%
3Y*
-23.03%
5Y*
-16.63%
10Y*
10.06%
ALL TIME*
19.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.43B$1.35B$1.47B
$66.42M$54.69M$50.99M

EEFT vs. ADBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEFT
Euronet Worldwide, Inc.
-6.28%-25.99%1.33%7.53%-20.80%-17.77%-8.02%53.90%21.49%16.35%
ADBE
Adobe Inc
-28.45%-21.29%-25.46%77.28%-40.65%13.38%51.64%45.78%29.10%70.22%

Correlation

The correlation between EEFT and ADBE is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 1997

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EEFT:

$2.72B

ADBE:

$99.54B

EPS

EEFT:

$8.17

ADBE:

$17.42

PE Ratio

EEFT:

8.73

ADBE:

14.38

PEG Ratio

EEFT:

0.11

ADBE:

1.01

PS Ratio

EEFT:

0.76

ADBE:

4.12

PB Ratio

EEFT:

2.64

ADBE:

8.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

EEFT:

$4.37B

ADBE:

$25.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EEFT:

$2.03B

ADBE:

$22.46B

EBITDA (TTM)

EEFT:

$644.80M

ADBE:

$9.68B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEFT vs. ADBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EEFT
EEFT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EEFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
EEFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEFT Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

ADBE
ADBE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ADBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADBE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ADBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADBE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EEFT vs. ADBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) and Adobe Inc (ADBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEFTADBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

0.88

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

-0.64

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.13

-1.21

+0.07

EEFT vs. ADBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is comparable to the ADBE Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEFT and ADBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEFT vs. ADBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEFT drawdown since its inception was -87.91%, which is greater than ADBE's maximum drawdown of -79.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEFT and ADBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEFTADBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.91%

-79.89%

-8.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.18%

-47.37%

+12.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.33%

-69.53%

+24.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.36%

-71.90%

+15.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.56%

-71.90%

+9.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.09%

-63.62%

+5.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.02%

-26.13%

-7.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.54%

24.94%

-1.40%

Volatility

EEFT vs. ADBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) is 14.55%, while Adobe Inc (ADBE) has a volatility of 16.26%. This indicates that EEFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEFTADBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.55%

16.26%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.14%

33.07%

-2.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.31%

38.55%

-3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.54%

37.37%

-1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.39%

34.84%

+1.55%

Dividends

EEFT vs. ADBE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EEFT nor ADBE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

EEFT vs. ADBE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Euronet Worldwide, Inc. and Adobe Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

EEFT vs. ADBE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Euronet Worldwide, Inc. and Adobe Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

EEFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Euronet Worldwide, Inc. reported a gross profit of 915.10M and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.6%.

ADBE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Adobe Inc reported a gross profit of 5.90B and revenue of 6.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.2%.

EEFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Euronet Worldwide, Inc. reported an operating income of 137.10M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.

ADBE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Adobe Inc reported an operating income of 2.24B and revenue of 6.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.8%.

EEFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Euronet Worldwide, Inc. reported a net income of 171.00M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.

ADBE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Adobe Inc reported a net income of 1.71B and revenue of 6.62B, resulting in a net margin of 25.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EEFT and ADBE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADBE has higher volatility (16.26%) compared to EEFT (14.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEFT dropped -87.91% vs ADBE's -79.89%.

EEFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.76 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEFT and ADBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer