EEFT vs. ADBE
EEFT (Euronet Worldwide, Inc.) and ADBE (Adobe Inc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Infrastructure industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, EEFT returned -1.18%/yr vs 7.77%/yr for ADBE. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EEFT vs. ADBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEFT achieves a -16.27% return, which is significantly higher than ADBE's -44.31% return. Over the past 10 years, EEFT has underperformed ADBE with an annualized return of -1.18%, while ADBE has yielded a comparatively higher 7.77% annualized return.
EEFT
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- -3.73%
- YTD
- -16.27%
- 6M
- -18.67%
- 1Y
- -36.26%
- 3Y*
- -17.15%
- 5Y*
- -14.97%
- 10Y*
- -1.18%
ADBE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -20.37%
- YTD
- -44.31%
- 6M
- -45.49%
- 1Y
- -48.29%
- 3Y*
- -26.19%
- 5Y*
- -19.44%
- 10Y*
- 7.77%
EEFT vs. ADBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEFT Euronet Worldwide, Inc. | -16.27% | -25.99% | 1.33% | 7.53% | -20.80% | -17.77% | -8.02% | 53.90% | 21.49% | 16.35% |
ADBE Adobe Inc | -44.31% | -21.29% | -25.46% | 77.28% | -40.65% | 13.38% | 51.64% | 45.78% | 29.10% | 70.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEFT and ADBE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 1997 | 0.29 |
Fundamentals
EEFT:
$2.99B
ADBE:
$78.35B
EEFT:
$7.97
ADBE:
$17.42
EEFT:
7.99
ADBE:
11.19
EEFT:
0.11
ADBE:
0.79
EEFT:
0.67
ADBE:
3.21
EEFT:
2.44
ADBE:
6.80
EEFT:
$4.34B
ADBE:
$25.20B
EEFT:
$2.98B
ADBE:
$22.46B
EEFT:
$666.90M
ADBE:
$9.68B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEFT vs. ADBE — Risk / Return Rank
EEFT
ADBE
EEFT vs. ADBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) and Adobe Inc (ADBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEFT | ADBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.74 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | -0.96 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | -1.93 | +0.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEFT vs. ADBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEFT drawdown since its inception was -87.91%, which is greater than ADBE's maximum drawdown of -79.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEFT and ADBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEFT | ADBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.91% | -79.89% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.64% | -50.29% | +9.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.53% | -69.30% | +22.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.36% | -71.69% | +15.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.56% | -71.69% | +9.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.56% | -71.69% | +9.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -26.02% | -7.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.93% | 24.98% | +2.95% |
Volatility
EEFT vs. ADBE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) is 11.12%, while Adobe Inc (ADBE) has a volatility of 15.97%. This indicates that EEFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEFT | ADBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.12% | 15.97% | -4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.81% | 29.35% | -2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.70% | 34.77% | -2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.14% | 36.59% | -1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.39% | 34.47% | +1.92% |
Dividends
EEFT vs. ADBE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EEFT nor ADBE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
EEFT vs. ADBE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Euronet Worldwide, Inc. and Adobe Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EEFT vs. ADBE - Profitability Comparison
EEFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Euronet Worldwide, Inc. reported a gross profit of 821.90M and revenue of 1.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.2%.
ADBE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adobe Inc reported a gross profit of 5.90B and revenue of 6.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.2%.
EEFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Euronet Worldwide, Inc. reported an operating income of 72.00M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.
ADBE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adobe Inc reported an operating income of 2.24B and revenue of 6.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.8%.
EEFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Euronet Worldwide, Inc. reported a net income of 95.30M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
ADBE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adobe Inc reported a net income of 1.71B and revenue of 6.62B, resulting in a net margin of 25.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EEFT and ADBE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ADBE has higher volatility (15.97%) compared to EEFT (11.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEFT dropped -87.91% vs ADBE's -79.89%.
EEFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.11 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEFT and ADBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer