EEFT vs. GDE
EEFT (Euronet Worldwide, Inc.) is a stock, while GDE (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund) is Gold fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Over the past 3 years, EEFT returned -12.57%/yr vs 42.22%/yr for GDE. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EEFT vs. GDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEFT achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than GDE's 2.09% return.
EEFT
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 15.95%
- 6M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- -24.75%
- 3Y*
- -12.57%
- 5Y*
- -11.06%
- 10Y*
- 0.69%
GDE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- 6M
- -3.13%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 36.96%
- 3Y*
- 42.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EEFT vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEFT Euronet Worldwide, Inc. | 1.55% | -25.99% | 1.33% | 7.53% | -26.56% |
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 2.09% | 73.76% | 44.79% | 33.85% | -8.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEFT and GDE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022 | 0.36 |
The correlation between EEFT and GDE shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEFT vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank
EEFT
GDE
EEFT vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEFT | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.23 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 1.66 | -2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 4.12 | -5.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEFT vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEFT drawdown since its inception was -87.91%, which is greater than GDE's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEFT and GDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEFT | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.91% | -32.01% | -55.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.00% | -22.66% | -17.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.52% | -22.66% | -23.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.59% | -17.40% | -37.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.98% | -8.10% | -25.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.86% | 9.13% | +19.73% |
Volatility
EEFT vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) have volatilities of 10.32% and 10.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEFT | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.32% | 10.16% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.78% | 26.07% | +1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.71% | 30.49% | +3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.22% | 27.09% | +8.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.25% | 27.09% | +9.16% |
Dividends
EEFT vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison
EEFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEFT Euronet Worldwide, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 4.23% | 4.32% | 7.14% | 2.22% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEFT and GDE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEFT has higher volatility (10.32%) compared to GDE (10.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEFT dropped -87.91% vs GDE's -32.01%.
GDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEFT and GDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer