EEFT vs. GDE
EEFT (Euronet Worldwide, Inc.) is a stock, while GDE (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund) is Gold fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Over the past 3 years, EEFT returned -6.63%/yr vs 38.84%/yr for GDE. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
EEFT vs. GDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEFT achieves a -6.28% return, which is significantly lower than GDE's -0.84% return.
EEFT
- 1D
- -6.96%
- 1M
- -7.58%
- 6M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- -6.28%
- 1Y
- -24.04%
- 3Y*
- -6.63%
- 5Y*
- -12.96%
- 10Y*
- -0.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.48%
GDE
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- 6M
- -11.26%
- YTD
- -0.84%
- 1Y
- 33.38%
- 3Y*
- 38.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 29.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $66.42M | $54.69M | $50.99M | |
| $4.75M | $8.80M | $9.79M |
EEFT vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEFT Euronet Worldwide, Inc. | -6.28% | -25.99% | 1.33% | 7.53% | -26.56% |
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | -0.84% | 73.76% | 44.79% | 33.85% | -8.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEFT and GDE is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EEFT and GDE has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEFT vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank
EEFT
GDE
EEFT vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEFT | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.21 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 1.49 | -2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 3.27 | -4.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEFT vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEFT drawdown since its inception was -87.91%, which is greater than GDE's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEFT and GDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEFT | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.91% | -32.01% | -55.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.18% | -22.66% | -12.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.33% | -22.66% | -22.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.09% | -19.77% | -38.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.02% | -8.25% | -25.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.54% | 10.30% | +13.24% |
Volatility
EEFT vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) has a higher volatility of 14.55% compared to WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) at 7.99%. This indicates that EEFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEFT | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.55% | 7.99% | +6.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.14% | 26.11% | +4.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.31% | 31.06% | +4.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.54% | 27.12% | +8.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.39% | 27.12% | +9.27% |
Dividends
EEFT vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison
EEFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEFT Euronet Worldwide, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 4.36% | 4.32% | 7.14% | 2.22% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEFT and GDE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEFT has higher volatility (14.55%) compared to GDE (7.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEFT dropped -87.91% vs GDE's -32.01%.
GDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEFT and GDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer