EDZ vs. TMF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EDZ (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDZ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-300%), while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDZ returned -36.41%/yr vs -16.34%/yr for TMF. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDZ charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.

Performance

EDZ vs. TMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDZ achieves a -56.25% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -5.59% return. Over the past 10 years, EDZ has underperformed TMF with an annualized return of -36.41%, while TMF has yielded a comparatively higher -16.34% annualized return.

EDZ

• 1D: 3.62%
• 1M: -18.11%
• YTD: -56.25%
• 6M: -58.86%
• 1Y: -74.18%
• 3Y*: -48.04%
• 5Y*: -24.82%
• 10Y*: -36.41%

TMF

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: -5.59%
• 6M: -9.73%
• 1Y: -3.14%
• 3Y*: -20.49%
• 5Y*: -30.44%
• 10Y*: -16.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDZ vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares	-56.25%	-59.30%	-12.71%	-20.28%	49.27%	-8.69%	-68.79%	-43.01%	32.87%	-64.12%
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF	-5.59%	-2.94%	-35.95%	-13.01%	-72.60%	-19.80%	39.02%	34.75%	-11.01%	22.72%

Correlation

The correlation between EDZ and TMF is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2009	0.20

The correlation between EDZ and TMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EDZ vs. TMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EDZ	TMF
Financial Services	26.2%	18.7%
Industrials	19.7%	-
Technology	14.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	-
Utilities	7.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.0%	-
Healthcare	5.9%	-
Energy	3.9%	-
Basic Materials	3.7%	-
Communication Services	3.4%	-
Real Estate	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

EDZ vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDZ

EDZ Risk / Return Rank: 0
EDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
EDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 0
EDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
EDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 0

TMF

TMF Risk / Return Rank: 8
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDZ vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDZ	TMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.25	-0.11	-1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.59	0.04	-2.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.70	1.00	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	-0.12	-0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.68	-0.27	-1.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDZ vs. TMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDZ Sharpe Ratio is -1.25, which is lower than the TMF Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDZ and TMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDZ	TMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.25	-0.11	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.44	-0.65	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.60	-0.37	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.60	-0.13	-0.47

Drawdowns

EDZ vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDZ drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than TMF's maximum drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDZ and TMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDZ	TMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.99%	-92.89%	-7.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-75.74%	-26.51%	-49.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-89.69%	-56.31%	-33.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.33%	-88.81%	-3.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.11%	-92.89%	-6.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-92.18%	-7.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-97.73%	-43.64%	-54.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	44.50%	11.55%	+32.95%

Volatility

EDZ vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) has a higher volatility of 25.57% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 7.99%. This indicates that EDZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDZ	TMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.57%	7.99%	+17.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.95%	19.02%	+32.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.51%	28.76%	+30.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.00%	46.72%	+10.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.97%	43.91%	+17.06%

EDZ vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDZ has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDZ vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison

EDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.10%, more than TMF's 4.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares	10.10%	6.58%	4.87%	4.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.82%	1.67%	0.68%	0.00%
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF	4.13%	4.06%	4.29%	2.82%	1.62%	0.13%	2.23%	0.94%	1.49%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDZ and TMF in my portfolio?

EDZ and TMF have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDZ or TMF?

EDZ has higher volatility (25.57%) compared to TMF (7.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDZ dropped -99.99% vs TMF's -92.89%.

Which ETF is better, EDZ or TMF?

On 10-year performance, TMF leads with -16.34% vs -36.41% for EDZ. On fees, TMF is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EDZ or TMF?

Over the 10-year period, TMF has performed better with a -16.34% return vs -36.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDZ or TMF?

TMF is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for EDZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDZ or TMF?

EDZ has the higher dividend yield at 10.10%, compared with 4.13% for TMF.

What is the main difference between EDZ and TMF?

EDZ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. EDZ tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-300%), while TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.08% for EDZ and 1.01% for TMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.