EDZ vs. TMF
EDZ (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDZ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-300%), while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDZ returned -34.13%/yr vs -17.81%/yr for TMF. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDZ charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.
Performance
EDZ vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDZ achieves a -50.67% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -10.00% return. Over the past 10 years, EDZ has underperformed TMF with an annualized return of -34.13%, while TMF has yielded a comparatively higher -17.81% annualized return.
EDZ
- 1D
- 6.39%
- 1M
- 17.31%
- 6M
- -40.86%
- YTD
- -50.67%
- 1Y
- -65.33%
- 3Y*
- -43.45%
- 5Y*
- -24.56%
- 10Y*
- -34.13%
TMF
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- 6M
- -13.01%
- YTD
- -10.00%
- 1Y
- -2.84%
- 3Y*
- -21.08%
- 5Y*
- -33.44%
- 10Y*
- -17.81%
EDZ vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares | -50.67% | -59.30% | -12.71% | -20.28% | 49.27% | -8.69% | -68.79% | -43.01% | 32.87% | -64.12% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -10.00% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDZ and TMF is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2009 | 0.19 |
The correlation between EDZ and TMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDZ vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
EDZ
TMF
EDZ vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDZ | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.01 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.11 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.44 | -0.22 | -1.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDZ vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDZ drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than TMF's maximum drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDZ and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDZ | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -92.89% | -7.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.94% | -26.51% | -48.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.46% | -55.14% | -35.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.91% | -88.81% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.90% | -92.89% | -6.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -92.55% | -7.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -97.73% | -43.94% | -53.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.52% | 13.06% | +32.46% |
Volatility
EDZ vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) has a higher volatility of 28.73% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 7.49%. This indicates that EDZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDZ | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.73% | 7.49% | +21.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.01% | 19.82% | +44.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.63% | 27.47% | +43.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.49% | 46.49% | +13.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.64% | 43.70% | +17.94% |
EDZ vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDZ has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDZ vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
EDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.78%, more than TMF's 4.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares | 6.78% | 6.58% | 4.87% | 4.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 1.67% | 0.68% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.39% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDZ and TMF have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDZ has higher volatility (28.73%) compared to TMF (7.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDZ dropped -99.99% vs TMF's -92.89%.
On 10-year performance, TMF leads with -17.81% vs -34.13% for EDZ. On fees, TMF is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TMF has performed better with a -17.81% return vs -34.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMF is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for EDZ.
EDZ has the higher dividend yield at 6.78%, compared with 4.39% for TMF.
EDZ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. EDZ tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-300%), while TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.08% for EDZ and 1.01% for TMF.
TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDZ and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer