PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDZ vs. HOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EDZ vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EDZ vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDZ achieves a -16.24% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -68.49% return.


EDZ

1D
-10.95%
1M
26.71%
YTD
-16.24%
6M
-25.08%
1Y
-61.49%
3Y*
-35.39%
5Y*
-16.80%
10Y*
-32.46%

HOOG

1D
12.50%
1M
-20.36%
YTD
-68.49%
6M
-83.51%
1Y
42.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EDZ vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDZ has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EDZ vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDZ
EDZ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
EDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
EDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDZ vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDZHOOGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.02

0.30

-1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.74

1.49

-3.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.18

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

0.47

-1.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.01

1.00

-2.01

EDZ vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDZ Sharpe Ratio is -1.02, which is lower than the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDZ and HOOG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDZHOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.02

0.30

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.58

0.16

-0.73

Correlation

The correlation between EDZ and HOOG is -0.45. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

EDZ vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

EDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, less than HOOG's 39.05% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EDZ
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares
5.27%6.58%4.87%4.34%0.00%0.00%0.82%1.67%0.68%
HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
39.05%12.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EDZ vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDZ drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than HOOG's maximum drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDZ and HOOG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EDZHOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-86.94%

-13.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.29%

-86.94%

+7.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-85.30%

-14.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-97.71%

-29.96%

-67.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

60.30%

41.02%

+19.28%

Volatility

EDZ vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) is 31.12%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 35.72%. This indicates that EDZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EDZHOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.12%

35.72%

-4.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.41%

101.26%

-56.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.73%

143.11%

-82.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.63%

143.89%

-88.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.46%

143.89%

-83.43%