EDV vs. VUG
EDV (Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDV is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury STRIPS 20-30 Year Equal Par Bond Index, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDV returned -3.32%/yr vs 18.26%/yr for VUG. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. EDV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
EDV vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDV achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 9.49% return. Over the past 10 years, EDV has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of -3.32%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.26% annualized return.
EDV
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- -0.72%
- 6M
- -3.69%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- -5.25%
- 5Y*
- -10.02%
- 10Y*
- -3.32%
VUG
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
EDV vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDV Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF | -0.72% | 0.65% | -12.78% | 1.65% | -39.15% | -6.19% | 23.59% | 18.67% | -3.40% | 13.94% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.49% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDV and VUG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2007 | -0.21 |
The correlation between EDV and VUG shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDV vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
EDV
VUG
EDV vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDV | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.31 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 1.69 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | 5.92 | -5.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDV | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 1.77 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.47 | 0.68 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.17 | 0.85 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.62 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
EDV vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDV drawdown since its inception was -59.96%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDV and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDV | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.96% | -50.68% | -9.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -16.53% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.99% | -22.85% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.03% | -35.61% | -19.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.96% | -35.61% | -24.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.45% | -1.51% | -52.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.43% | -7.09% | -16.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.38% | 4.71% | +0.67% |
Volatility
EDV vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.83%. This indicates that EDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDV | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 3.83% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | 12.11% | -2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.64% | 15.84% | -1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.63% | 22.22% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.81% | 21.44% | -1.63% |
EDV vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EDV vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
EDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDV Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF | 4.99% | 4.94% | 4.65% | 3.81% | 3.28% | 1.95% | 5.54% | 3.51% | 2.90% | 2.92% | 5.32% | 4.24% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDV and VUG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDV has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to VUG (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDV dropped -59.96% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 18.26% vs -3.32% for EDV. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 18.26% return vs -3.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for EDV.
EDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.
EDV is categorized as Government Bonds, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. EDV tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury STRIPS 20-30 Year Equal Par Bond Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for EDV and 0.03% for VUG.
VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDV and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer