EDV vs. BLV
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV).
EDV and BLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EDV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury STRIPS 20-30 Year Equal Par Bond Index. It was launched on Dec 6, 2007. BLV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. Both EDV and BLV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EDV or BLV.
Key characteristics
| EDV | BLV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -9.89% | -2.39% |
| 1Y Return | 4.45% | 7.71% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -16.99% | -8.06% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -8.70% | -2.84% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -1.16% | 1.50% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.30 | 0.75 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.56 | 1.12 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.06 | 1.13 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.11 | 0.27 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.70 | 2.00 |
| Ulcer Index | 8.84% | 4.44% |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.65% | 11.87% |
| Max Drawdown | -59.96% | -38.29% |
| Current Drawdown | -53.04% | -27.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDV and BLV is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EDV vs. BLV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EDV achieves a -9.89% return, which is significantly lower than BLV's -2.39% return. Over the past 10 years, EDV has underperformed BLV with an annualized return of -1.16%, while BLV has yielded a comparatively higher 1.50% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EDV vs. BLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than BLV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EDV vs. BLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EDV vs. BLV - Dividend Comparison
EDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, less than BLV's 4.54% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDV Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF | 4.31% | 3.55% | 3.28% | 1.95% | 5.54% | 3.51% | 2.90% | 2.92% | 5.32% | 4.24% | 3.12% | 5.03% |
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 4.54% | 4.06% | 4.17% | 3.37% | 5.84% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 3.63% | 4.16% | 4.37% | 3.90% | 4.85% |
Drawdowns
EDV vs. BLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDV drawdown since its inception was -59.96%, which is greater than BLV's maximum drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDV and BLV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EDV vs. BLV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) at 3.94%. This indicates that EDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.