EDOW vs. VOTE
EDOW (First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF) and VOTE (Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - EDOW tracks the Dow Jones Industrail Average Equal Weight TR while VOTE tracks the Morningstar US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EDOW returned 15.49%/yr vs 22.81%/yr for VOTE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EDOW charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOTE.
Performance
EDOW vs. VOTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOW achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly lower than VOTE's 11.03% return.
EDOW
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 5.68%
- 6M
- 5.68%
- 1Y
- 18.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- 8.89%
- 10Y*
- —
VOTE
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 11.03%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- 28.11%
- 3Y*
- 22.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDOW vs. VOTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOW First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF | 5.68% | 15.46% | 13.17% | 15.47% | -7.45% | 6.43% |
VOTE Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF | 11.03% | 17.95% | 25.23% | 27.60% | -19.74% | 12.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOW and VOTE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between EDOW and VOTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
EDOW vs. VOTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDOW
VOTE
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
EDOW
VOTE
Financial Services
EDOW
VOTE
Industrials
EDOW
VOTE
Healthcare
EDOW
VOTE
Consumer Cyclical
EDOW
VOTE
Consumer Defensive
EDOW
VOTE
Communication Services
EDOW
VOTE
Energy
EDOW
VOTE
Basic Materials
EDOW
VOTE
Real Estate
EDOW
-
VOTE
Utilities
EDOW
-
VOTE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOW vs. VOTE — Risk / Return Rank
EDOW
VOTE
EDOW vs. VOTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDOW | VOTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.42 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 3.10 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.89 | 14.23 | -6.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDOW | VOTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.34 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.80 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
EDOW vs. VOTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOW drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, which is greater than VOTE's maximum drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOW and VOTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOW | VOTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.72% | -25.71% | -8.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -9.10% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.51% | -19.08% | +3.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -0.70% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -6.14% | +2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 1.98% | +0.37% |
Volatility
EDOW vs. VOTE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) is 2.74%, while Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that EDOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOW | VOTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | 2.96% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.92% | 9.20% | -1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.68% | 12.08% | -1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 17.15% | -2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 17.15% | +0.59% |
EDOW vs. VOTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VOTE's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOW vs. VOTE - Dividend Comparison
EDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than VOTE's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOW First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF | 1.24% | 1.31% | 1.65% | 1.93% | 1.91% | 1.52% | 1.84% | 1.88% | 1.82% | 0.75% |
VOTE Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF | 0.90% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.54% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOW and VOTE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOTE has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to EDOW (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOW dropped -33.72% vs VOTE's -25.71%.
On 3-year performance, VOTE leads with 22.81% vs 15.49% for EDOW. On fees, VOTE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, EDOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VOTE has performed better with a 22.81% return vs 15.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOTE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EDOW.
EDOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.90% for VOTE.
EDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrail Average Equal Weight TR, while VOTE tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Engine No. 1 LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EDOW and 0.05% for VOTE.
VOTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDOW and VOTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer