EDOW vs. DGT
EDOW (First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF) and DGT (State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDOW is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrail Average Equal Weight TR, while DGT is a Global Equities fund tracking the The Global Dow. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDOW returned 8.89%/yr vs 13.59%/yr for DGT. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
EDOW vs. DGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOW achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly lower than DGT's 12.72% return.
EDOW
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 5.68%
- 6M
- 5.68%
- 1Y
- 18.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- 8.89%
- 10Y*
- —
DGT
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- 1Y
- 30.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
EDOW vs. DGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOW First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF | 5.68% | 15.46% | 13.17% | 15.47% | -7.45% | 18.82% | 6.64% | 24.69% | -2.04% | 11.90% |
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF | 12.72% | 30.04% | 14.15% | 20.95% | -8.00% | 21.50% | 9.67% | 22.19% | -9.65% | 9.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOW and DGT is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between EDOW and DGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
EDOW vs. DGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDOW
DGT
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
EDOW
DGT
Financial Services
EDOW
DGT
Industrials
EDOW
DGT
Healthcare
EDOW
DGT
Consumer Cyclical
EDOW
DGT
Consumer Defensive
EDOW
DGT
Communication Services
EDOW
DGT
Energy
EDOW
DGT
Basic Materials
EDOW
DGT
Real Estate
EDOW
-
DGT
Utilities
EDOW
-
DGT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOW vs. DGT — Risk / Return Rank
EDOW
DGT
EDOW vs. DGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDOW | DGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.48 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 3.70 | -1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.89 | 15.02 | -7.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDOW | DGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.59 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.90 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.29 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
EDOW vs. DGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOW drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, smaller than the maximum DGT drawdown of -55.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOW and DGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOW | DGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.72% | -55.36% | +21.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -8.38% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.51% | -14.67% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.98% | -25.18% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -0.58% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -13.83% | +9.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 2.06% | +0.29% |
Volatility
EDOW vs. DGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) is 2.74%, while State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that EDOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOW | DGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | 3.94% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.92% | 9.54% | -1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.68% | 11.98% | -1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 15.16% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 16.95% | +0.79% |
EDOW vs. DGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EDOW and DGT have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
EDOW vs. DGT - Dividend Comparison
EDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than DGT's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF | 2.52% | 2.78% | 2.83% | 2.53% | 3.15% | 2.66% | 1.97% | 2.76% | 2.50% | 1.93% | 2.31% | 2.37% |
EDOW First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF | 1.24% | 1.31% | 1.65% | 1.93% | 1.91% | 1.52% | 1.84% | 1.88% | 1.82% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOW and DGT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGT has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to EDOW (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOW dropped -33.72% vs DGT's -55.36%.
On 5-year performance, DGT leads with 13.59% vs 8.89% for EDOW. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, EDOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGT has performed better with a 13.59% return vs 8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EDOW and DGT have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
DGT has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 1.24% for EDOW.
EDOW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DGT is Global Equities. EDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrail Average Equal Weight TR, while DGT tracks The Global Dow. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street.
DGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDOW and DGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer