PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDOW vs. QQQE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDOW vs. QQQE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDOW achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly lower than QQQE's 14.79% return.


EDOW

1D
0.78%
1M
0.84%
6M
7.82%
YTD
10.49%
1Y
21.11%
3Y*
15.32%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.57%

QQQE

1D
0.29%
1M
-2.56%
6M
13.07%
YTD
14.79%
1Y
21.68%
3Y*
14.21%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
14.70%
ALL TIME*
14.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$755.60K$679.73K$683.44K
$22.33M$22.31M$23.91M

EDOW vs. QQQE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDOW
First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF
10.49%15.46%13.17%15.47%-7.45%18.82%6.64%24.69%-2.04%11.90%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
14.79%14.58%6.98%33.76%-24.47%17.93%37.85%36.43%-5.40%7.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EDOW and QQQE is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2017

0.74

The correlation between EDOW and QQQE shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EDOW vs. QQQE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDOW
QQQE

Technology

19.4%
44.3%

Financial Services

16.1%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
10.9%

Healthcare

12.9%
8.8%

Industrials

12.9%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.7%
8.0%

Communication Services

6.5%
9.6%

Basic Materials

3.2%
1.0%

Energy

3.2%
1.8%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Utilities

-

3.9%

Technology

EDOW
19.4%
QQQE
44.3%

Financial Services

EDOW
16.1%
QQQE
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EDOW
12.9%
QQQE
10.9%

Healthcare

EDOW
12.9%
QQQE
8.8%

Industrials

EDOW
12.9%
QQQE
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

EDOW
9.7%
QQQE
8.0%

Communication Services

EDOW
6.5%
QQQE
9.6%

Basic Materials

EDOW
3.2%
QQQE
1.0%

Energy

EDOW
3.2%
QQQE
1.8%

Real Estate

EDOW

-

QQQE
0.7%

Utilities

EDOW

-

QQQE
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDOW vs. QQQE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EDOW
EDOW Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQE
QQQE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QQQE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EDOW vs. QQQE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDOWQQQEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.22

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

2.11

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

6.75

+1.87

EDOW vs. QQQE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the QQQE Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDOW and QQQE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDOW vs. QQQE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDOW drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQE drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOW and QQQE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDOWQQQEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.72%

-32.14%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-9.41%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.51%

-21.38%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.98%

-32.14%

+10.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-4.46%

+4.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-5.14%

+1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.94%

-0.61%

Volatility

EDOW vs. QQQE - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) have volatilities of 3.75% and 3.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDOWQQQEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

3.68%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

12.96%

-4.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.93%

16.02%

-5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.23%

20.58%

-6.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.65%

20.76%

-3.11%

EDOW vs. QQQE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDOW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDOW vs. QQQE - Dividend Comparison

EDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than QQQE's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDOW
First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF
1.24%1.31%1.65%1.93%1.91%1.52%1.84%1.88%1.82%0.75%0.00%0.00%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
0.58%0.52%0.86%0.79%0.98%3.83%0.54%0.74%0.80%0.65%1.17%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDOW and QQQE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDOW has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to QQQE (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOW dropped -33.72% vs QQQE's -32.14%.

On 5-year performance, EDOW leads with 9.82% vs 8.11% for QQQE. On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EDOW has performed better with a 9.82% return vs 8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EDOW.

EDOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.58% for QQQE.

EDOW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QQQE is Nasdaq-100. EDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrail Average Equal Weight TR, while QQQE tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EDOW and 0.35% for QQQE.

EDOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDOW and QQQE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer