PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDOW vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDOW vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDOW achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.


EDOW

1D
-1.18%
1M
3.18%
YTD
5.68%
6M
5.68%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*

USL

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
63.07%
6M
59.66%
1Y
57.86%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDOW vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDOW
First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF
5.68%15.46%13.17%15.47%-7.45%18.82%6.64%24.69%-2.04%11.90%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
63.07%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-14.15%18.26%

Correlation

The correlation between EDOW and USL is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2017

0.21

The correlation between EDOW and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EDOW vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDOW
USL

Technology

20.0%

-

Financial Services

17.5%
4.5%

Industrials

13.6%

-

Healthcare

13.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

9.9%

-

Communication Services

6.5%

-

Energy

3.3%

-

Basic Materials

3.3%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

EDOW
20.0%
USL

-

Financial Services

EDOW
17.5%
USL
4.5%

Industrials

EDOW
13.6%
USL

-

Healthcare

EDOW
13.4%
USL

-

Consumer Cyclical

EDOW
12.7%
USL

-

Consumer Defensive

EDOW
9.9%
USL

-

Communication Services

EDOW
6.5%
USL

-

Energy

EDOW
3.3%
USL

-

Basic Materials

EDOW
3.3%
USL

-

Real Estate

EDOW

-

USL

-

Utilities

EDOW

-

USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDOW vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDOW
EDOW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
EDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDOW vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDOWUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

3.47

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.89

7.02

+0.87

EDOW vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDOW and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDOWUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

2.04

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.58

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.01

+0.63

Drawdowns

EDOW vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDOW drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOW and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDOWUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.72%

-89.06%

+55.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-16.76%

+8.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.51%

-23.33%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.98%

-33.82%

+11.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-38.16%

+36.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-61.46%

+57.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

8.27%

-5.92%

Volatility

EDOW vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) is 2.74%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that EDOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDOWUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

10.53%

-7.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

23.33%

-15.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.68%

28.54%

-17.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

30.08%

-15.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.74%

32.35%

-14.61%

EDOW vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDOW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDOW vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

EDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDOW
First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF
1.24%1.31%1.65%1.93%1.91%1.52%1.84%1.88%1.82%0.75%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDOW and USL have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to EDOW (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOW dropped -33.72% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 5-year performance, USL leads with 17.41% vs 8.89% for EDOW. On fees, EDOW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EDOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USL has performed better with a 17.41% return vs 8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EDOW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

EDOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

EDOW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. EDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrail Average Equal Weight TR, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EDOW and 0.88% for USL.

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDOW and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer