EDOW vs. SPXM
EDOW (First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. EDOW is passively managed, while SPXM is actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDOW charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.
Performance
EDOW vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EDOW
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 5.68%
- 6M
- 5.68%
- 1Y
- 18.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- 8.89%
- 10Y*
- —
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDOW vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EDOW First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF | 5.68% | 7.87% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 9.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOW and SPXM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOW vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank
EDOW
SPXM
EDOW vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDOW | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDOW | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 1.56 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
EDOW vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOW drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOW and SPXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOW | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.72% | -5.08% | -28.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -0.75% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -0.79% | -3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | — | — |
Volatility
EDOW vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOW | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.92% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.68% | 8.18% | +2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 8.18% | +6.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 8.18% | +9.56% |
EDOW vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOW vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison
EDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOW First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF | 1.24% | 1.31% | 1.65% | 1.93% | 1.91% | 1.52% | 1.84% | 1.88% | 1.82% | 0.75% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOW and SPXM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EDOW.
EDOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EDOW and 0.47% for SPXM.
Find the right allocation for EDOW and SPXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer