PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDOW vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDOW vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDOW achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.


EDOW

1D
-1.18%
1M
3.18%
YTD
5.68%
6M
5.68%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*

KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDOW vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EDOW
First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF
5.68%15.46%13.17%15.47%-7.45%18.82%6.64%24.69%1.41%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.20%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between EDOW and KNG is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.85

The correlation between EDOW and KNG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDOW vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDOW
KNG

Technology

20.0%
4.3%

Financial Services

17.5%
12.7%

Industrials

13.6%
20.3%

Healthcare

13.4%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

9.9%
23.5%

Communication Services

6.5%

-

Energy

3.3%
3.0%

Basic Materials

3.3%
10.2%

Real Estate

-

4.4%

Utilities

-

6.1%

Technology

EDOW
20.0%
KNG
4.3%

Financial Services

EDOW
17.5%
KNG
12.7%

Industrials

EDOW
13.6%
KNG
20.3%

Healthcare

EDOW
13.4%
KNG
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

EDOW
12.7%
KNG
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

EDOW
9.9%
KNG
23.5%

Communication Services

EDOW
6.5%
KNG

-

Energy

EDOW
3.3%
KNG
3.0%

Basic Materials

EDOW
3.3%
KNG
10.2%

Real Estate

EDOW

-

KNG
4.4%

Utilities

EDOW

-

KNG
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDOW vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDOW
EDOW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
EDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDOW vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDOWKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.13

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

0.87

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.89

2.25

+5.63

EDOW vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDOW and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDOWKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

0.73

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.32

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.49

+0.14

Drawdowns

EDOW vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDOW drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, roughly equal to the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOW and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDOWKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.72%

-35.12%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-8.61%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.51%

-14.24%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.98%

-18.20%

-3.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-5.89%

+4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-4.13%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

3.32%

-0.97%

Volatility

EDOW vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) has a higher volatility of 2.74% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that EDOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDOWKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

2.29%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

7.39%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.68%

10.19%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

13.59%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.74%

17.18%

+0.56%

EDOW vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDOW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDOW vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

EDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than KNG's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDOW
First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF
1.24%1.31%1.65%1.93%1.91%1.52%1.84%1.88%1.82%0.75%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDOW and KNG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDOW has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOW dropped -33.72% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 5-year performance, EDOW leads with 8.89% vs 4.31% for KNG. On fees, EDOW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EDOW has performed better with a 8.89% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EDOW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 1.24% for EDOW.

EDOW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while KNG is Dividend. EDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrail Average Equal Weight TR, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EDOW and 0.75% for KNG.

EDOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDOW and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer